<?php
$title = "Latest News";
ini_set('include_path', './' . PATH_SEPARATOR . '../' . PATH_SEPARATOR . ini_get('include_path'));
include_once("include/header.php");
?>

    <div class="imagesInsideFloatRight">
        <h2>OceanCurrent News Archive</h2>

		<article>
			<h3>Sydney-Hobart yacht race: ocean currents looking very favourable this year</h3>
			<a name=20141220><em>20, 22, 23 December 2014</em></a>
			<a href="Syd-Hob/2014/2014122703.html" target="_blank"><img src=Syd-Hob/2014/2014122703.gif height=250></a>
			<img src="misc/RSHYR2014_20Dec_GE.jpg" height=250 align=right>
			<p><b>23 Dec:</b> There is very little new information since yesterday, but what there is suggests that the eddy SE of 
				Jervis bay is slipping southwards. A third (since 8 Dec) drifting buoy is passing by Montague Island 
				just outside the 200m isobath, slightly slower than the previous two, suggesting the flow speed has 
				reduced, and/or that farther offshore is where the strongest southward speed is to be encountered. 
				Our imagery will continue to update (unless something goes wrong in our absence). Our Google Earth feed 
				allows you to overlay the 
				<a href="http://www.rolexsydneyhobart.com/tracker/google-earth/" target="_blank">CYCA yacht position data</a> 
				on our maps of the ocean currents. The screen-grab at right (a view looking towards Tasmania from Sydney) 
				is what you see if you do this today.
			</p>
			<p><b>22 Dec:</b> The latest satellite data indicates that the two eddies mentioned in our 20 Dec post have indeed 
				merged, and now form a very elongated eddy whose northern extreme is about 75km off Jervis Bay. Its southern 
				extreme, which is about 400km south, is less distinct because the eddy is partially attached to a third eddy 
				(also anticlockwise-rotating) to the east, centred at about 39S 154E. This is most clearly seen in the 
				larger-scale sea-surface height map for <a href=SE/20141217.html>SE Australia</a>. That map also shows 
				the points where we have sea level data. These are quite sparse, and non-existent between the eddy centre 
				and southern NSW. Evidence that our interpolation procedures have correctly estimated the eddy's shape is 
				provided by the tracks of two drifting buoys which first did loops around the unmerged eddies, and are 
				now looping around the merged eddies.
			</p>
			<p>What should yachts do to make the most of the current? That's the navigator's job to decide. One thing is 
				clear: ocean currents change significantly from day to day, so there can be a big difference between the 
				information available pre-race (which can be several days old) and what the yachts experience. For example, 
				last year the map for <a href="Syd-Hob/2013/2013121803.html">18 Dec</a> showed favourable currents along 
				the southern NSW shelf. We now know, however, that by <a href="Syd-Hob2/2013/2013122707.html">27 Dec</a> 
				the flow had stopped or even reversed. To see how that happened, view the animations available via the [DATE INDEX] 
				link on those pages. 
			</p>
			<p><b>20 Dec:</b> It's possible that the ocean currents will give yachts more of a boost this year than in 
				any of the last ten years. Indeed, if the current holds steady for the next week, which is possible 
				but certainly not guaranteed, the Sydney-Hobart yachts could benefit from about 2kt of southward flow for 
				about a third of the distance.
			</p>
			<p> We had to look as far back as <a href="Syd-Hob2/2004/2004122612.html" target="_blank">2004</a> to find a 
				year when the currents along the rhumbline appeared to be as favourable. But don't take our word for it. See 
				for yourself how present conditions compare with
				<a href="Syd-Hob/2005/2005122515.html" target="_blank">2005</a>,  
				<a href="Syd-Hob2/2006/2006122707.html" target="_blank">2006</a>,  
				<a href="Syd-Hob2/2007/2007122704.html" target="_blank">2007</a>,  
				<a href="Syd-Hob2/2008/2008122606.html" target="_blank">2008</a>,  
				<a href="Syd-Hob/2009/2009122612.html" target="_blank">2009</a>,  
				<a href="Syd-Hob2/2010/2010122807.html" target="_blank">2010</a>,  
				<a href="Syd-Hob2/2011/2011122704.html" target="_blank">2011</a>,  
				<a href="Syd-Hob2/2012/2012122606.html" target="_blank">2012</a> and  
				<a href="Syd-Hob2/2013/2013122803.html" target="_blank">2013</a>. 
			</p>
			<p>As indicated on the map for <a href="Syd-Hob/2014/2014121915.html" target="_blank"> today (20 Dec)</a>, 
				our most-recent velocity estimates are valid for 15 December, a full 11 days before race day. The situation 
				could become different by 26 Dec, especially considering that the favourable currents showing at present are 
				associated with two anti-clockwise rotating eddies that are very close to each other. These may merge or they 
				could move with respect to each other, possibly leaving a counter-rotating eddy somewhere along the rhumb line. 
				The navigators know this, and will be watching the imagery right up until race time.
			</p>
		</article>
        <article>
            <h3>Estimating the drift of dead whales </h3>
            <a name=20141112><em>12 November 2014</em></a>
            <a href="DonPer_chl/2014/2014110404.html" target="_blank"><img src=DonPer_chl/2014/2014110404.gif height=200></a>
            <p>A dead humpback whale was about to come ashore on Perth's Cottesloe Beach yesterday, in what might have
                been a
                repeat of the cause of last week's $170,000 clean-up exercise on Scarborough Beach. Referring to the
                image at
                right <a href=Rottnest_chl/2014/2014110404.html target="_blank">[zoom in]</a>
                <a href=Rottnest/2014/2014110307.html target="_blank">[zoom in, SST]</a>,
                and taking the forecast winds into account, Prof Pattiaratchi advised authorities that towing the whale
                15km
                offshore of Rottnest Island would result in an even chance that ocean currents would take the carcass
                away. As
                far as we know, this is the first time that IMOS infrastructure has been used for an application of this
                nature.
                Media coverage: <a
                    href=https://au.news.yahoo.com/thewest/video/watch/25487737/concerns-for-whale-carcass/>au.news.yahoo.com/thewest/video/watch/25487737/concerns-for-whale-carcass</a>
            </p>
        </article>
        <article>
            <h3>East Australian Current 'reversals' off Brisbane - 3 years in a row in June-July </h3>
            <a name=20140903><em>3 Sep 2014</em></a>
            <a href=Brisbane2/2012/2012070203.html target="_blank"><img src=Brisbane2/2012/2012070203.gif
                                                                        height=300></a>
            <a href=Brisbane2_chl/2012_64/2012070204.html target="_blank"><img src=Brisbane2_chl/2012_64/2012070204.gif
                                                                               height=300></a>
            <p>The Brisbane region is where the flow along the continental slope is most consistently fast and to the
                south,
                because of the East Australian Current, right? Well, yes, but sometimes the flow along the slope does
                turn
                northward (e.g. as we discussed <a href=#20091220> with reference to the fate of AHS
                    <em>Centaur</em></a>). In
                fact, it has now done this in three June-July periods in succession, the <a
                    href=Brisbane2/2014/Brisbane2201407.fli>most
                    recent one</a> resulting in some striking SST imagery. The imagery shows that the EAC is not
                actually
                reversed - its just displaced offshore.
            </p>
            <p>Data from the IMOS EAC current meter array, which was deployed to measure the transport of this most
                important of Australia's ocean currents at a critical location, are <a href=technews.htm> now
                    available</a>
                and not surprisingly the data are rich with interesting features. One of these is a month-long anomaly
                in
                June-July 2012 that was an example of the EAC not flowing along the continental slope. This event was
                monitored in real-time by <a href=sst_anom/2012/20120611.html>satellite observations</a> of low sea
                level,
                low surface temperatures and high chlorophyll, which all show that the flow of the EAC was displaced
                offshore by a cyclonic eddy. What the current meter data (e.g. from the <a
                    href=timeseries/ANMN_P10/EAC2-2012-WORKHORSE-ADCP-81_zt.html>ADCP at 80m in 2000m</a>) reveal is
                that on
                <a href=Brisbane2/2012/2012060709.html>7 June</a> the flow velocity off Brisbane suddenly dropped from
                normal values to near-zero, where it stayed until <a href=Brisbane2/2012/2012071115.html>11 July</a>.
                During
                that period of near-zero flow along the 2000m isobath, the flow farther offshore at the other instrument
                moorings swung from shoreward on <a href=Brisbane2/2012/2012062104.html>21 June</a> to northward on <a
                    href=Brisbane2/2012/2012070203.html>2 July</a> (as shown at right) then to seaward on <a
                    href=Brisbane2/2012/2012070405.html>4 July</a> before turning south on 11 July and accellerating to
                speeds in excess of 1m/s by 15 July. The satellite data show that this sequence of events can be
                explained
                by the movement of the cyclonic eddy that in early June was centered more than 100km NE of the array (at
                26.4S 155.4E) but then moved west and subsequently south, passing through the array in early July then
                continuing along the continental slope.
            </p>
            <p>Cyclonic eddies also appeared inshore of the EAC in October 2012 (e.g. see <a
                    href=Brisbane2/2012/2012102514.html>25 Oct</a> although on this occasion the eddy was quite small)
                and
                in the next two years (e.g. in 2013: <a href=Brisbane2/2013/2013060415.html>4 June</a>, <a
                    href=Brisbane2/2013/2013062504.html>25 June</a> and see also the <a
                    href=Brisbane2_chl/2013/2013062504.html>chlorophyll</a>
                image, and in 2014: <a href=Brisbane2/2014/2014071715.html>15 July</a> as mentioned above).
            </p>
            <p> These reversals are important for a number of reasons. To mention just two: 1) they are responsible for
                a
                large amount of cross-shelf exchange (as can be seen in the chlorophyll images as well as the
                u-component
                velocity timeseries) with potentially major consequences for transport of fish larvae and everything
                else in
                the water - near Brisbane and farther south, and 2) turbines harvesting energy from the flow would be
                affected.
            </p>
        </article>
        <article>
            <h3>Where are Australia's fastest ocean currents?</h3>
            <a name=20140806><em>6 Aug 2014</em></a>
            <p>
                <a href=misc/GiantTides.jpg target="_blank"><img src=misc/GiantTides.jpg height=130></a>
                This honour probably goes to one of the passages of the Buccaneer Archipelago. Sunday Strait, for
                example,
                is
                the main shipping route into King Sound and the town of Derby. Hydrographic chart AUS 733 notes that
                flow
                speeds
                of ~10kt (~5m/s) occur there. We are unaware of any instrumental measurements to verify that estimate,
                but
                offer
                this observation: At 1630WST on 29 July 2014 (close to the time of maximum spring ebb tide), it took two
                250hp
                outboards running at 2700rpm to keep the Giant Tides Tour RIB stationary in Escape Pass <a
                    href=misc/P1170050.MOV>as dramatic whirlpools swept by</a>. From this, the skipper estimated the
                flow
                speed
                to be 9kt.
            </p>
        </article>
        <article>
            <h3>Malaysia Airlines MH370: estimated drift of buoyant wreckage</h3> <a name=20140704><em>4 July 2014</em></a>
            <p>
                <a href=misc/OM_af_MH370_18_tp3sl_line/20140318.html target="_blank"><img
                        src=misc/OM_af_MH370_18_tp3sl_line/20140318.gif height=200></a>
                Australia coordinated the search of the sea surface for wreckage of Malaysia Airlines flight MH370 from
                18
                March
                to 28 April, 2014. The Drift Working Group assembled by the Australian Maritime Safety Authority used
                several
                techniques, throughout the search, to estimate the drift of potential wreckage as part of the
                optimisation
                of
                the conduct of search operations, which involved as many as 12 aircraft and 12 vessels from a number of
                nations.
                The focus of efforts shifted north-eastward along the '7th arc' from early March when it was thought the
                plane
                could have flown as far south as 45S, to 21S where the flight recorder's pinger signal was thought, in
                mid-April, to have been detected by <em>Ocean Shield</em>.
            </p>
            <p>
                The Australian Transport Safety Bureau's June 26 report <a
                    href=http://www.atsb.gov.au/mh370/mh370-definition-of-underwater-search-areas.aspx target="blank">"MH370
                    - Definition of Underwater Search Areas"</a> shows what is presently believed to be the most likely
                region of the crash. The panel at right shows two estimates of where three types of debris might have
                been
                distributed on 18 March when the search off Australia commenced. These simulations use the ATSB estimate
                of
                the <a href=misc/OM_af_MH370_18_tp3sl_line/20140308.html target="_blank">8 March</a> crash region, and
                CSIRO
                trajectory modelling based on the Bureau of Meteorology winds and ocean current (left panel), and IMOS
                <em>OceanCurrent</em>
                surface current (right panel). The red, black and blue dots represent items with three degrees of
                exposure
                to the wind, drifting downwind at 2.8%, 1% and 0% of the 10m wind velocity, in addition to the two
                estimates
                of the velocity of the water. By <a href=misc/OM_af_MH370_18_tp3sl_line/20140328.html target="_blank">28
                    March,</a> when the estimated location of the crash site was close to the updated location used
                here,
                our 90km x 700km rectangle of tracked particles is dispersed into a region of approximately 300km x
                500km.
                That 'drifted region' was searched until 4 April and again between 15 and 28 April (from 5-14 April the
                crash site was thought to be farther north, where potential pinger signals were detected). At the end of
                the
                search on <a href=misc/OM_af_MH370_18_tp3sl_line/20140428.html target="_blank">28 April</a>, the tracked
                particles in these two simulations, combined, occupy a 1500km x 1000km expanse of ocean.
            </p>
            <p>Could debris from the aircraft, if still afloat, wash up on the coast of WA? According to our
                simulations,
                this is indeed possible, but very unlikely. A few of the 2700 tracked particles are now <a
                    href=misc/OM_af_MH370_18_tp3sl_line/20140629.html target="_blank">(29 June)</a> estimated to be at
                the
                edge of the continental shelf. Winter westerly winds could conceivably bring those ashore. The vast bulk
                of
                the tracked particles, however, are 900-2500km west of Australia.
            </p>
        </article>
        <article>
            <h3>Pacific Ocean cool surface</h3> <a name=20140317><em>17 March 2014</em></a>
            <p>
                <a href=sst_anom/20140312.html><img src=sst_anom/20140312.png height=200></a>
                For several months now, the surface temperature of the Pacific Ocean between New Caledonia and Australia
                has
                been a degree or more cooler than usual, as shown at right (click to enlarge). The satellite temperature
                image
                is rich in detail but it is far from being the whole story. Firstly, note how the cool patches are all
                depicted
                as rotating clockwise. We infer this rotation from the sea level map which features depressions at those
                places,
                consistent with a positive anomaly of the depth-integrated density, which could be caused by lower
                temperature
                and/or higher salinity. One hypothesis worth exploring is that reduced rainfall in that region has
                increased
                the
                surface salinity (by failing to balance evaporation). This reduces the near-surface gradient of density,
                allowing the wind to keep the thickness of the mixed-layer deeper than usual, thereby keeping the
                temperature
                lower than usual. This hypothesis may explain the measurements by Argo float 5902084, which sampled a
                near-surface salinity anomaly of <a href=profiles/5902084/20140311_5902084_193_0312.html> +0.25 in the
                    upper
                    100m</a>, but it does not explain the measurements by nearby float 5904257 which sampled a <a
                    href=profiles/5904257/20140311_5904257_22_0312.html>more-normal vertical profile</a>. Here, the
                isotherms
                and isohalines are shifted down by about 100m, thus reducing the depth-integrated density anomaly and
                raising
                the surface elevation, even though the temperature anomaly at the surface is zero or even slightly
                negative.
                This downward shift could only have been caused by a local accumulation or convergence of EAC waters,
                such
                as
                might result from the net transport southwards along the shelf being temporarily reduced. The question
                is
                why
                this advective deepening of the surface layer was not accompanied by any increase of surface
                temperature,
                but a
                reduction instead.
            </p>
        </article>
        <article>
            <h3>Rottnest Channel Swim: <em>Don't expect the usual northward current flow</em></h3> <a name=20140220><em>20,21
                    February 2014</em></a>
            <p>
                <a href=misc/22_Feb_2014.png><img src=misc/22_Feb_2014.png width=300></a>
                Recent satellite and HF radar observations, and forecasts of <a
                    href=http://www.bom.gov.au/wa/forecasts/perth.shtml>wind</a>, <a
                    href=http://www.bom.gov.au/australia/meteye/>waves</a> and ocean currents (at right, click to
                enlarge)
                indicate that conditions for the 2014 <a href=http://Rottnestchannelswim.com.au>Rottnest Swim</a> (22
                Feb)
                could
                contribute to relatively fast times.
            </p>
            <p>Modelled ocean currents from the <a href=http://www.oceans.uwa.edu.au/>Oceans Institute of the University
                    of
                    Western Australia</a> indicate that the recent and persistent shift to an easterly air stream over
                southern West Australia will produce anomalous ocean current conditions:- a weak (<0.2m/s) southward or
                southwestward flow (becoming weaker or slightly northward towards the end of the race) rather than the
                usual
                northward currents that are common at this time of the year.
            </p>
            <p><a href=http://www.transport.wa.gov.au/imarine/cottesloe-tide-and-wave.asp>Wave observations</a> and
                forecasts indicate the swimmers will have following seas (generated by the local easterly winds).
                <a href=Rottnest/2014/2014022014.html><img src=Rottnest/2014/2014022014.gif height=200></a>
            </p>
            <p>The strong northward flow last week and <a href=Rottnest/2014/2014021916.html>more recently</a> brought cooler
                water (21-22C) to the surface north of Rottnest Island, and this appears <a
                    href=Rottnest/2014/2014022019.html>today</a>
                to be coming south and into the race area. The image at right also shows the surface current estimated
                by
                the two IMOS HF radar systems near Perth; the northern one in magenta and the southern one in red. These
                estimates (which are also shown on <a href=http://www.mapswim.com> mapswim</a>) are least accurate at
                the
                edges of the coverage (as evidenced by the disagreement where they overlap) and are subject to many
                sources
                of interference. The Rottnest channel is at the very edge of the coverage, so the north/south component
                of
                the flow is very uncertain.
            </p>
            <p>FFI, or to provide feedback, contact Roger Proctor 0400 153 449 or <a
                    href=mailto:roger.proctor@utas.edu.au>
                    email</a>.
            </p>
        </article>
        <article>
            <h3>Extreme Bonnie Coast Upwelling</h3> <a name=20140212><em>12 February, 5 March, 13 June 2014</em></a>
            <p>
                <a href=SAgulfs_chl/2014/2014030804.html><img src=SAgulfs_chl/2014/2014030804.gif height=200></a>
                <a href=SAgulfs/2014/2014020423.html><img src=SAgulfs/2014/2014020423.gif height=200></a>
                Winds associated with the combination of low atmospheric pressure over SE Australia and high pressure
                west
                of
                Tasmania around <a href=GAB/20140204.html> 4 February 2014</a> caused an extremely strong upwelling
                event
                stretching from the Eyre Peninsula to Portland, so this season can certainly be characterised as one
                that
                started early (see below) and included at least one extreme event. The surface velocities associated
                with
                the
                upwelling were measured by both the SA-IMOS HF radars, as shown at right (click to enlarge), confirming
                expectations from basic theory and numerical modelling that the flow is essentially alongshore in the
                upwelling
                region, with just a small component directed offshore to drive the upwelling. The dynamics is very
                different,
                and more complex, outside the continental shelf in the deep ocean, where eddies exist and the
                wind-driven
                current is not constrained to follow the coast.<br>
            <h3>5 March update:</h3> Strong upwelling also occurred around <a href=SAgulfs/2014/2014022106.html>21 Feb</a> to
            <a
                href=SAgulfs/2014/2014030318.html>3 March</a>.
            <br><h3>13 June update:</h3> Now that MODIS imagery is available again, we can see the impact on 8 March on
            chl-a
            of the upwelling, at right.
            </p>
        </article>
        <article>
            <h3>Ocean current analysis for the Sydney to Hobart yacht race</h3> <a name=20131222><em>22 December
                    2013</em></a>
            <p>
                <a href=Syd-Hob/2013/2013121803.html><img src=Syd-Hob/2013/2013121803.gif height=200></a>
                <a href=SNSW/2013/2013122003.html><img src=SNSW/2013/2013122003.gif height=200></a>
                This year's fleet will negotiate three significant ocean eddies. The first, seen at right south-east of
                Jervis
                Bay on 20 Dec (click to enlarge), is unfavourable, but may dissipate or move farther offshore between
                now
                and
                Boxing Day. Skippers will want to keep inshore of this, other factors being equal. The 2nd is more
                important.
                Well-exploited all the way from 36S to about 39S, it could give yachts a significant advantage (1-4h)
                over
                those
                that do not find this river of southward flowing tropical water. Finally, an isolated warm-core eddy is
                off
                Tasmania's Freycinet Peninsula (42S), potentially giving a small boost to yachts keeping a bit farther
                east
                than
                others.
            </p>
        </article>
        <article>
            <h3>Bonnie Coast upwelling: a strong, early start of the 2013-14 season</h3> <a name=20131121><em>21-28
                    November
                    2013</em></a>
            <p>
                <a href=SAgulfs/2013/2013111706.html><img src=SAgulfs/2013/2013111706.gif height=200></a>
                The first upwelling of the 2013-14 season occurred from <a href=GAB/2013/20131116.html>11-17
                    November</a>
                due to
                strong south-east winds for several days. This was a strong event, especially for so early in the
                season,
                with
                the NOAA satellites seeing upwelled water at 12-13&#176 C, the HF radar seeing surface flows of 0.3m/s
                to
                the NW
                and tidegauges seeing coastal sea level depressed by 0.2m. This occurence of an early, strong upwelling
                in
                November is in contrast to the lack of strong upwelling until March during the <a href=#20130306>previous
                    summer</a>. The event is quite well simulated by the Bluelink relocatable model <a
                    href=misc/SAgulfs_Ex356_tv_1m_1h201311.fli> animation of hourly surface t and v</a> which shows
                excellent
                agreement with the HF radar data, and an upwelled plume of 15&#176 C water.
                <br>
            <h3>22 Nov Update:</h3> A run of the model from <a href=misc/SAgulfs_Ex357_tv_1m_24h_s201311.fli>1 Nov
                to 24
                Nov</a> forecasts that strong upwelling will continue with colder water continuing to come to the
            surface
            this weekend.
            <br><h3>25 Nov Update:</h3> The latest few images (up to <a href=SAgulfs/2013/2013112419.html>19Z 24 Nov</a>
            vindicate the forecast, showing a plume of water at the surface that is even colder than last week (although
            the
            seasonally-changing colourbar does exaggerate this a little). Some frontal features appear to have shifted
            up to
            8km over 3h, or 0.75m/s, suggesting the flow is more energetic than forecast. The imagery also suggests that
            cold water is surfacing north of Kangaroo Island, and west of the Eyre Peninsula, where the HF radar has
            recorded flows of about 0.4m/s to the NW. It will be a few days before we see if the geostrophic velocity
            field
            agrees with this, and somewhat longer until we see what the IMOS ADCPs and CTDs have recorded. An Argo
            profile
            on <a href=profiles/5903302/20131121_5903302_146_1119.html>21 Nov</a> confirms that the offshore
            stratification
            was close to normal at that point, with the upwelled 12&#176 C water encountered at 250m.
            <br><h3>26 Nov Update:</h3> From <a href=http://bluewhalestudy.org>Peter Gill</a>: The first pygmy blue
            whale
            sightings for this upwelling season were reported south-east of Portland a week or two ago. Continued strong
            upwelling may draw larger aggregations of blue whales in coming months. Last year's season was certainly
            characterised by fewer blue whale sightings and weak upwelling.
            <br><h3>28 Nov Update:</h3> HF radar surface velocity vectors from the Bonney Coast CODAR units are now
            added to
            the graphics.
            </p>
        </article>
        <article>
            <h3>Throttling of both the Leeuwin and East Australian Currents</h3> <a name=20131113><em>13 November
                    2013</em></a>
            <p>
                <a href=Brisbane/2013/2013110906.html><img src=Brisbane/2013/2013110906.gif height=180></a>
                <a href=Ningaloo/2013/2013111005.html><img src=Ningaloo/2013/2013111005.gif height=180></a>
                By chance, the southard flows of both the Leeuwin Current (LC) and the East Australian Current (EAC) are
                presently being strongly impeded by eddies near the continental slope. On the west coast, the opposing
                force
                is
                from an anticyclonic (anti-clockwise rotating, warm-core, high sea level) eddy that is diverting the LC
                offshore, while on the east coast it is a cyclonic (clockwise, cold-core, low sea level) eddy that is
                achieving
                a similar effect. In both cases, some of the flow continues southward after completing a detour around
                the
                eddy
                but it is clear that there are impacts downstream (incuding the end of the warm spell off NSW discussed
                last
                month) when these diversions occur, as well as local impacts inshore of the eddies where there is
                suddenly
                much
                less tropical water. Both eddies have been sampled near their centres by Argo profilers. The 70m
                downward
                displacement (compared with climatology) in the <a
                    href=profiles/5901677/20131108_5901677_179_1108.html>Ningaloo</a> eddy is in good agreement with our
                satellite-based projection, as is the 100m upward displacement in the <a
                    href=profiles/5904257/20131104_5904257_9_1106.html>Brisbane</a> eddy.
            </p>
        </article>
        <article>
            <h3>Unusually warm winter waters off NSW</h3> <a name=20131014><em>14 October 2013</em></a>
            <p>
                <a href=LordHoweS/2013/2013101005.html><img src=LordHoweS/2013/2013101005.gif width=300></a>Surface
                waters over the NSW continental shelf and nearby in the Tasman Sea have been much warmer than usual
                since
                early
                August. Shelf waters off the Sydney-Woolongong shelf are presently 22&#176C or more in places as shown
                at
                right,
                about 4&#176C <a href=sst_anom/2013/20131009.html>warmer than usual</a>. A few Argo floats have sampled
                these
                anomalous conditions at key locations, confirming the satellite estimates and showing that the <a
                    href=profiles/5903677/20131004_5903677_94_1006.html>warm anomaly</a> extends down to 600m at places.
                As
                is
                usually the case, however, the warmth of the regions directly affected by the East Australian Current is
                contrasted by a nearby <a href=profiles/5903917/20130916_5903917_66_0916.html> cold anomaly </a> that
                exceeds
                3&#176 between depths of 300 and 500m in the centre of a cyclonic eddy farther offshore. The cold
                anomaly is
                not
                great at the surface, so its location is less obvious in the thermal imagery. It showed up more in the
                altimeter
                data, as a sea level depression exceeding 0.6m in <a href=SE/2013/20130831.html>August</a>.
            </p>
        </article>
        <article>
            <h3>Highlights of the ANMN regional (shelf) ADCP data</h3> <a name=20130702><em>2 July 2013</em></a>
            <p>
                Today's <a href=technews.htm#20130702>Technical News Item</a> announces an update of our <a
                    href=timeseries>time-series
                    page</a> showing Acoustic Doppler Current Profiler data. Below are some examples of what these data
                reveal
                about events in the ocean, as a continuation of the list <a href=#20130417>below</a>.
            </p>
            <p>
            <h3>Southern GBR, April 2012:</h3> The strongest non-tidal current measured east of Heron Island occurred on
            <a href=timeseries/ANMN_P5/GBROTE-1203-Workhorse-ADCP-48.html>13 April 2012</a>. This was associated with
            the high sea level event discussed <a href=#20120420>earlier</a>, adding to the list of locations impacted
            by that wave.
            </p>
            <p><a href=Coffs/2013/2013020222.html><img src=Coffs/2013/2013020222.gif width=300></a>
            <h3>Coff's
                Harbour, Feb 2013:</h3> Very strong upwelling and northward flow on the continental shelf near Coff's
            occured around 2 Feb 2013, as a small, intense cyclonic feature grew and then 'rolled' south down the coast.
            <a href=Brisbane/2013/2013011805.html>Two weeks earlier</a>, the East Australian current was flowing as a
            nearly-laminar jet along the continental slope and shelf between Fraser Island (25S) and Newcastle (33S),
            where it started flowing around a large warm-core eddy forming off <a href=LordHoweS/2013/2013011805.html>Sydney</a>.
            Cooler nearshore surface temperatures indicate that coastal upwelling was occurring from Stradbroke Island
            (27.5S) southwards, e.g. near <a href=Coffs/2013/2013011805.html>Coffs</a>, but especially south of Port
            Macquarie (31.5S). On <a href=Brisbane/2013/2013012914.html>29 Jan</a> it is clear from the (patchy) imagery
            that the upwelling had greatly increased following strong upwelling-favourable winds associated with a high
            pressure system centered on New Zealand and a low over Queensland from 24-<a href=ht/2013/20130128.html>28
                Jan</a>. The <a href=timeseries/ANMN_P5/CH070-1302-Workhorse-ADCP-69p6.html>CH070</a> and <a
                href=timeseries/ANMN_P5/CH100-1302-Workhorse-ADCP-95p2.html>CH100</a> ADCPs recorded the low bottom
            temperatures (17C) on and prior to 29 Jan, offshore-directed surface-layer flow to the SE on <a
                href=Coffs/2013/2013012805.html>28 Jan</a>(i.e.left of the wind as expected), then a strong reversal of
            the flow to the north on <a href=Coffs/2013/2013020222.html>2 Feb</a> which the HF radar shows to be
            associated with a small cyclonic feature centered over the 1000m isobath. This little eddy remains within
            the coverage of the radar until about <a href=Coffs/2013/2013020514.html>5 Feb</a> when it gets swept south.
            the physics of the eddy's formation is a fascinating combination of 1) geostrophic uplift of the isopycnals
            associated with the (essentially laminar) EAC, 2) ageostrophic uplift to balance the wind-driven surface
            Ekman transport, and 3) transfer of kinetic energy and cyclonic vorticity from the laminar flow to an
            isolated feature. This is a mechanism of first-order importance to across-shelf transport, so it is
            important that we obtain a more detailed understanding of it for many reasons.
            </p>
            <p>
                <a href=SAgulfs/2011/2011052119.html><img src=SAgulfs/2011/2011052119.gif width=300></a>
            <h3>Southern
                shelf, May 2011, 2012 and Sept 2012:</h3> Current speeds in excess of 1m/s were recorded by the <a
                href=timeseries/ANMN_P5/index.html#south2QC2>southern</a> array of ADCPs on <a
                href=timeseries/ANMN_P5/SAM5CB-1104-Workhorse-ADCP-86.html>21 May 2011</a> <a
                href=SAgulfs/2011/2011052119.html>[map view]</a> and <a
                href=timeseries/ANMN_P5/SAM5CB-1202-Workhorse-ADCP-92.html>5 Sept 2012</a> <a
                href=SAgulfs/2012/2012090506.html>[map view]</a> at the SAM5 mooring in 95m off the Eyre Peninsula and
            on 10 May 2012 <a href=SAgulfs/2012/2012051016.html>[map view]</a> at the <a
                href=timeseries/ANMN_P5/SAM3MS-1111-Workhorse-ADCP-163.html>SAM3</a> and <a
                href=timeseries/ANMN_P5/SAM7DS-1111-Workhorse-ADCP-350.html>SAM7</a> moorings in 165m and 350m off
            Kangaroo Island. The ADCP data agree fairly well with the HF radar and geostrophic estimates. On all 3
            occasions, the strong along-shelf flow and very high (isostatically adjusted) coastal sea level were driven
            by strong westerly winds in the Great Australian Bight in the previous days. The winds resulted from low
            pressure systems on <a href=ht/2011R00/20110521.html>21 May 2011</a>, <a href=ht/2012/20120904.html>4 Sept
                2012</a>, and <a href=ht/2012R00/20120508.html>8 May 2012</a> but these systems were clearly of very
            different nature, and the details of the history of the wind-stress field is possibly what explains the fact
            that the May 2011 and Sept 2012 systems drove strongest currents at the midshelf (SAM5) mooring, while the
            May 2012 system drove strongest currents at the outer shelf (SAM3) mooring. Aside: the <a
                href=timeseries/ANMN_P5/SAM3MS-1111-Workhorse-ADCP-163.html>SAM3</a> (near-bottom) temperature record
            reaches an annual peak shortly after the strong current event, because the South Australian Current is an
            extension of the Leeuwin Current, with relatively warm waters downwelling to depth along the shelf break
            during winter. The temperature maximum at 350m at the <a
                href=timeseries/ANMN_P5/SAM7DS-1111-Workhorse-ADCP-350.html>SAM7</a> mooring in 2012 is not until Sept
            (after the flow of the SAC has peaked) at which time <a href=SAgulfs/2012/2012091105.html>SST images</a>
            show a sharp front along the shelf break.
            </p>
        </article>
        <article>
            <h3>Ocean currents too strong for NSW lobster fishers</h3>
            <a name=20130621><em>21,27 June 2013</em></a>
            <p><a href=SNSW/2013/2013051604.html><img src=SNSW/2013/2013051604.gif width=300></a> A warm-core
                eddy shed recently <a href=misc/Syd-Hob201304.AVI>[April-June animation AVI format, use Internet
                    Explorer]</a>
                from the East Australian Current is making life difficult for lobster fisher Steve Drake of Kiama
                (34.7S)
                because his marker buoys are being dragged under by strong flow along the shelf break near the 200m
                isobath
                <a
                    href=SNSW/2013/2013061614.html>[16 June map]</a>. Mr Drake said the strong southward flow has
                persisted
                since 8 May. The image for <a href=SNSW/2013/2013051604.html>16 May 2013</a> (at right) shows the flow
                off
                Sydney-Jervis Bay in mid-May to be part of the East Australian Current going around an anticyclonic
                meander
                in
                the manner typical of incipient eddy-shedding. The new eddy became completely detached from the EAC
                around
                <a
                    href=SNSW/2013/2013053103.html>31 May</a> when the cyclonic eddy discussed here <a
                    href=#20130503>earlier</a> came close to the shelf break off Newcastle (33.5S). The new warm-core
                eddy
                is
                likely to persist for months off the southern NSW coast, possibly reaching Tasmania in some form in
                summer.
                The
                presence of a warm eddy off NSW does not always result in warm coastal water temperatures, because the
                strong
                southward flow can cause coastal upwelling (due to two processes; the bottom Ekman layer and thermal
                wind).
                But
                if the eddy, for whatever reason, comes very close to the coast there will be no cold water to upwell.
                This
                appears to have been the case off Sydney from mid-May to now, to the delight of <a
                    href=http://www.smh.com.au/environment/weather/last-chance-for-that-ocean-dip-20130607-2nuqd.html>beach-goers</a>.
                IMOS ANMN mooring data will confirm or refute this hypothesis, when available.
            </p>
            <p>
                Mr Drake's problems did not start in early May. From the 12th to 27th of April, his buoys were dragged
                under
                by strong <em>northward</em> flow. This is the first time he has seen this persist for more than a few
                days.
                The image for <a href=SNSW/2013/2013042306.html>23 April</a> shows that the northward flow was
                associated
                with the southern cyclonic eddy also mentioned here <a href=#20130503>earlier</a>. That cold-core eddy
                was
                sampled by IMOS glider mission sg516 <a href=misc/Dory4_2013050903.jpg>[SST image for 9 May with glider
                    track from Sydney 23 March to Narooma 28 May]</a> so analysis of those data will be valuable for
                understanding the dynamics and consequences of this extraordinary event.
            </p>
        </article>
        <article>
            <h3>MODIS snapshots of the Leeuwin Current off south-west WA, 2002-2012</h3> <a name=20130509><em>9,24 May,
                    & 8
                    July 2013</em></a>
            <p><img src=Perth_chl/2008_64/2008062104.gif width=400> The <a href=technews.htm#20120622>22 June
                    2012 Technical News item</a> listed some of the best MODIS Chlorophyll-a images for the initial
                2011-2012
                batch of MODIS imagery, and compared these with the recent re-processing using SeaDAS6.4. Here, we list
                some
                of
                the clearest or interesting images of the Leeuwin Current in south-west WA, for 2002-2011. The peculiar
                seasonality of the Leeuwin current and the associated cycle of surface chlorophyll, appearing where you
                might
                least expect it, is clear:
            </p>
            <ul>
                <li><a href=Perth_chl/2002_64/2002081804.html>18 Aug 2002</a> Winter: low-moderate (for here) surface
                    chl
                    with
                    weak gradients.
                <li><a href=Perth_chl/2002_64/2002121704.html>17 Dec 2002</a> Early summer: clear waters everywhere.
                <li><a href=Perth_chl/2003_64/2003043004.html>30 Apr 2003</a> Leeuwin season: warm core eddies off
                    shelfbreak
                    with higher surface chl, <a href=Perth_chl/2003_64/2003052804.html>28 May</a> more developed, <a
                        href=Perth_chl/2003_64/2003061904.html>19 Jun</a> more again.
                <li><a href=Perth_chl/2003_64/2003090204.html>2 Sep 2003</a> decline of surface chl.
                <li><a href=Perth_chl/2004_64/2004050404.html>4 May 2004</a>, <a href=Perth_chl/2004_64/2004052904.html>29
                        May</a> Next Leeuwin season: cycle repeats.
                <li><a href=Perth_chl/2004_64/2004091204.html>12 Sep 2004</a> declining surface chl, <a
                        href=Perth_chl/2004_64/2004112004.html>20 Nov</a>
                <li><a href=Perth_chl/2005_64/2005011604.html>16 Jan 2005</a> northward shelf currents drive narrow
                    streaks
                    of
                    high-chl water offshore.
                <li><a href=Perth_chl/2005_64/2005041904.html>19 Apr 2005</a>, <a
                        href=Perth_chl/2005_64/2005062704.html>27
                        Jun</a> Leeuwin season: warm core eddies off shelfbreak with higher surface chl,
                <li><a href=Perth_chl/2005_64/2005111404.html>14 Nov 2005</a> decline of surface chl.
                <li><a href=Perth_chl/2006_64/2006022004.html>20 Feb 2006</a> pre-Leeuwin field of complex eddies
                <li><a href=Perth_chl/2006_64/2006031604.html>16 Mar 2006</a> <a href=Perth_chl/2006_64/2006033004.html>30
                        Mar</a> <a href=Perth_chl/2006_64/2006051104.html>11 May</a> <a
                        href=Perth_chl/2006_64/2006052704.html>27
                        May</a> <a href=Perth_chl/2006_64/2006060504.html>5 Jun</a> Leeuwin season.
                <li><a href=Perth_chl/2006_64/2006100604.html>6 Oct 2006</a> post-Leeuwin decline of surface chl.
                <li><a href=Perth_chl/2006_64/2006122304.html>23 Dec 2006</a> Mid summer clear waters.
                <li><a href=Perth_chl/2007_64/2007012004.html>20 Jan 2007</a> A pulse of northward (wind-driven) shelf
                    flow,
                    and
                    small pre-Leeuwin eddies.
                <li><a href=Perth_chl/2007_64/2007030504.html>5 March 2007</a> clear waters everywhere.
                <li><a href=Perth_chl/2007_64/2007032404.html>24 March 2007</a> chl increasing on shelf.
                <li><a href=Perth_chl/2008_64/2008062104.html>21 Jun 2008</a> Strong Leeuwin with higher-chlor eddies
                    separated
                    by clear ocean waters.
                <li><a href=Perth_chl/2008_64/2008100804.html>8 Oct 2008</a> Filaments of chlor-a water.
                <li><a href=Perth_chl/2009_64/2009030604.html>6 Mar 2009</a> Post-summer clear waters.
                <li><a href=Perth_chl/2009_64/2009040504.html>5 Apr 2009</a> Three complex eddies.
                <li><a href=Perth_chl/2009_64/2009041604.html>16 Apr 2009</a> Rare absence (for April) of normal
                    conditions.
                <li><a href=Perth_chl/2009_64/2009092604.html>26 Sep 2009</a> Post-winter conditions: many eddies but
                    small
                    horizontal gradients of chlor-a.
                <li><a href=Perth_chl/2009_64/2009112304.html>23 Nov 2009</a> As above, but water clearing as summer
                    starts.
                <li><a href=Perth_chl/2010_64/2010011604.html>16 Jan 2010 </a> Mid summer, clear waters, Leeuwin not
                    flowing.
                <li><a href=Perth_chl/2010_64/2010022404.html>24 Feb 2010</a> As above, but with filaments off Abrolhos
                <li><a href=DonPer_chl/2010_64/2010041804.html>18,</a> <a
                        href=DonPer_chl/2010_64/2010041904.html>19,</a> <a
                        href=DonPer_chl/2010_64/2010042404.html>24,</a> <a href=DonPer_chl/2010_64/2010042704.html>27
                        Apr</a>
                    and <a href=DonPer_chl/2010_64/2010050504.html>5 May 2010</a> Zoom-in on Perth region showing
                    pinch-off
                    of
                    an eddy (radar just installed).
                <li><a href=Perth_chl/2010_64/2010080204.html>2 Aug 2010</a> Winter conditions again: higher min
                    chlor-a,
                    lower
                    maxima.
                <li><a href=Perth_chl/2010_64/2010092204.html>22 Sep 2010</a> As above.
                <li><a href=Perth_chl/2010_64/2010100804.html>8 Oct 2010</a> As above, water clearing.
                <li><a href=Perth_chl/2010_64/2010103104.html>31 Oct 2010</a> As above, anticyclonic eddies retaining
                    winter
                    levels of chlor-a.
                <li><a href=Perth_chl/2011_64/2011031304.html>13,</a> <a href=Perth_chl/2011_64/2011031504.html>15,</a>
                    <a
                        href=Perth_chl/2011_64/2011031604.html>16 Mar 2011</a> a thin filament of high-chlor-a water is
                    drawn
                    (or pushed?) offshore from the Abrolhos Islands.
                <li><a href=Perth_chl/2011_64/2011051104.html>11 May 2011</a> Strong early-Leeuwin conditions:
                    anticyclonic
                    (warm core) eddies growing, with high surface chlor-a densities,
                <li><a href=Perth_chl/2011_64/2011042204.html>22 Apr 2011</a> ... then pinching off from the Leeuwin.
                    <br>
                    Lists for other regions will be made soon. Input is welcome. <h3>8 July update:</h3> Sorry, no
                    progress
                    on
                    that yet, but we have now added 'gallery' index pages to all the images with least cloud. E.g. see
                    the
                    [gallery] link at the <a href=SNSW_chl>SNSW date index</a>.
            </ul>
        </article>
        <article>
            <h3>Fourteen loops and counting: why do cyclonic eddies trap drifters?</h3> <a name=20130503><em>3 May
                    2013</em></a>
            <p><img src=LordHoweS/2013/2013050214.gif width=400>
                There is presently a satellite-tracked drifter apparently trapped in a cold-core eddy off NSW. On <a
                    href=LordHoweS/2013/2013050214.html> 2 May 2013</a> it was at 33S 155.5E, doing ~30km-diameter
                clockwise
                loops in a 120km-diameter cyclonic eddy. The 'parent' cold-core eddy of the present, smaller eddy has
                existed
                for a long time but between <a href=LordHoweS/2013/2013031307.html> 13 March</a> and <a
                    href=LordHoweS/2013/2013031616.html> 16 March</a> it became elongated to the NNW. The drifter did
                its
                first
                cyclonic loop at the northern limit of this feature (32S 155E) on <a
                    href=LordHoweS/2013/2013032021.html> 20
                    March</a>, then proceeded to do many more as the eddy meandered about (the images around <a
                    href=LordHoweS/2013/2013042423.html> 24 April</a> are the clearest). The MODIS image for <a
                    href=LordHoweS_chl/2013/2013041004.html> 10 April</a> shows that the eddy had low (near-surface)
                chlorophyll-a,
                in contrast to the other cyclonic eddy positioned a similar distance offshore, off Jervis Bay at 35S.
                Stepping
                back through time reveals that the difference between the eddies' chlorophyll concentations is explained
                by
                their different origins; the southern one having been formed over the continental shelf near
                Sydney-NewCastle
                around <a href=LordHoweS_chl/2013/2013031304.html>13 March</a>. The tendency of drifters to remain in eddies
                has
                been
                noted before but we cannot recall an instance of a drifter doing so many loops in a cyclonic eddy in
                this
                region
                before. Does it matter? Yes, because it tells us something about the exchange of water between the eddy
                and
                its
                surroundings. It also suggests there may be some convergence at the surface and therefore downwelling at
                the
                centre of the eddy, and also that the eddy is certainly not a wavelike feature, with a sea level anomaly
                essentially un-coupled from any particular mass of water.
            </p>
        </article>
        <article>
            <h3>Recent highlights of the ANMN regional (shelf) ADCP data</h3> <a name=20130417><em>17 April
                    2013</em></a>
            <p>Our <a href=technews.htm#20130327>Technical News Item</a> announces a new page showing <a
                    href=timeseries>time-series</a>
                of Acoustic Doppler Current Profiler data. Below are some highlights (listed clockwise from Qld) of what
                these
                data reveal about recent events in the ocean.
            </p>
            <ul>
                <li><h3>Townsville, Feb 2011:</h3> What caused the depth of the <a
                        href=timeseries/ANMN_P3/GBRPPS-1010-Workhorse-ADCP-64.html>Palm Passage</a> and <a
                        href=timeseries/ANMN_P3/GBRMYR-1010-Continental-195.html>Myrmidon reef</a> ADCPs to suddenly
                    increase by 20m, and the current velocity to suddenly spike, on 2 Feb 2011? <a
                        href=NE/2011R00/20110202.html>Hint</a>
                <li><h3>Mackay, July 2011:</h3> The <a href=timeseries/ANMN_P3/index.html#east2QC2>2010-2012 summary
                        page for
                        the east</a> shows that the Elusive Reef (GBRELR, 21S 153E) ADCP is the one that measured the
                    steadiest, strongest flow. May-July 2011 stands out as a rare period of low flow speed. The
                    page-per-deployment plot for <a
                        href=timeseries/ANMN_P3/GBRELR-1103-Workhorse-ADCP-229.html>GBRELR-1103</a> shows no reason to
                    suspect an instrument malfunction. The flow speed reduces during the period from 23 April to 8 May
                    2011
                    (starting at 200m then finally reaching the surface) and remains low until 6 July 2011 when it
                    suddenly
                    increases again. The reason for this appears to be that a cyclonic eddy came very close to the ADCP,
                    diverting the East Australian Current away from it, as can be seen by comparing our gridded sea
                    level
                    map for <a href=NE/2011R00/20110607.html>7 June</a> (a day in the middle of the event when Cryosat
                    data
                    is dense near the mooring, so the eddy is well observed) with the map for <a
                        href=NE/2011R00/20110412.html>12 April</a> when comparable Cryosat coverage shows normal
                    conditions
                    before the event, and <a href=NE/2011R00/20110716.html>16 July</a>, when the eddy has moved north,
                    away
                    from the mooring.
                <li><h3>Coffs, May 2012:</h3> Why is the flow suddenly northward, and bottom temperature raised, on
                    16-18 May
                    at the <a href=timeseries/ANMN_P3/CH070-1205-Workhorse-ADCP-67p9.html>Coffs Harbour 70m ADCP</a>? <a
                        href=Coffs/2012/2012051805.html> SST and HF radar</a> make it clear.
                <li><h3>Coffs, Aug-Sep 2012:</h3> The <a href=#20120813>EAC disappearing act of Aug 2012</a> was thought
                    to be
                    associated with a sudden wind-driven northward current pulse on 10 August and associated vertical
                    mixing, occurring at a time of minimal flow of EAC waters along shelf. The <a
                        href=timeseries/ANMN_P3/CH070-1207-Workhorse-ADCP-68p5.html>CH070 </a> and <a
                        href=timeseries/ANMN_P3/CH100-1207-Workhorse-ADCP-97p9.html> CH100</a> ADCPs certainly recorded
                    the
                    northward current pulse but no temperature rise at the bottom due to vertical mixing is evident.
                    The southward resurgence of the EAC along the shelf was recorded by the ADCPs, HF radar, a drifter
                    and
                    also SST and altimetry. Most of the EAC was still flowing around the cyclonic eddy off the
                    continental
                    shelf in late Sep 2012 <a href=SE/2012/20120916.html> [altimetry for 16 Sep]</a> <a
                        href=Brisbane/2012/2012092014.html> SST for 20 Sep</a>. Over the following weeks, the warm water
                    resumed its usual southward path over the continental shelf. The advancing 'nose' of the
                    near-surface
                    flow had a complex horizontal structure <a href=Coffs/2012/2012092005.html>[20]</a> <a
                        href=Coffs/2012/2012092116.html>[21]</a> <a href=Coffs/2012/2012092504.html>[25]</a> and <a
                        href=Coffs/2012/2012092804.html>[28]</a> Sep zoom-ins. We cannot, of course see the spatial
                    structure at depth but it is clearly very different to the surface flow, as evidenced by the
                    northward
                    or near-zero flow recorded by the <a href=timeseries/ANMN_P3/CH100-1209-Workhorse-ADCP-95.html>100m
                        ADCP</a> at depth from 14-28 Sep.
                <li><h3>Coffs-Sydney, April 2012:</h3> On <a href=#20120420>20 April 2012</a> we speculated about the
                    impact
                    of a large Coastal Trapped Wave that we could see (in tidegauge data) travelling up the NSW coast.
                    ANMN
                    mooring data clearly show now that the anomalous northward pulse was indeed about 0.5m/s as
                    anticipated,
                    off Sydney around 10 April, as shown in the depth-time plots of <a
                        href=timeseries/ANMN_P3/SYD100-1204-Workhorse-ADCP-99p5.html>SYD100 </a>, <a
                        href=timeseries/ANMN_P3/SYD140-1202-Workhorse-ADCP-137p5.html>SYD140</a> and <a
                        href=timeseries/ANMN_P3/CH070-1203-Workhorse-ADCP-72p9.html>CH070</a> ADCP data. These data are
                    also
                    shown now in the <a href=SNSW/2012/2012041009.html>SNSW map view</a>.
                <li><h3>Sydney, Jan 2011:</h3> On <a href=#20110122>22 Jan 2011</a> we wrote about an extreme warm-core
                    eddy
                    that was forming off Sydney. ANMN mooring data <a
                        href=timeseries/ANMN_P3/SYD140-1012-Workhorse-ADCP-137p5.html>[depth-time plot of SYD140
                        ADCP]</a>
                    <a href=timeseries/ANMN_P3/SYD100-1012-Workhorse-ADCP-103p5.html> [SYD100]</a> clearly show the
                    impact
                    on coastal currents of the eddy coming up onto the inner shelf, as also seen in the <a
                        href=SNSW/2011/2011011606.html>[SST map for 16 Jan 2011]</a>.
                <li><h3>Adelaide, June 2011:</h3><a href=SAgulfs/2011/2011062505.html>The South Australian Current in
                        full
                        swing, June 2011</a>, as evidenced by ADCP, HF radar, a surface drifter, altimetry and SST.
                    Watch
                    the <a href=SAgulfs/2011/SAgulfs201106.fli> June 2011 animation </a> to see how well these observing
                    systems agree and/or complement each other.
                <li><h3>Perth, Jan-Feb 2012</h3> The switch from <a href=DonPer/2012/2012011217.html>strong southward
                        flow on
                        12 Jan</a> to <a href=DonPer/2012/2012011917.html> northward flow on 19 Jan</a> at the <a
                        href=timeseries/ANMN_P3/WATR20-1112-Continental-194.html>Two Rocks 200m</a> ADCP was due to the
                    passage over the mooring line of the southern edge of a growing Leeuwin Current warm-core eddy. This
                    eddy was south of the line by <a href=DonPer/2012/2012013020.html>30 Jan</a> (after a period of
                    alternating hot and cold winds which affected both the SST and inner-shelf currents) so the currents
                    became more westward. The flow at the ADCPs switched back to southward on <a
                        href=DonPer/2012/2012022216.html> 22 Feb</a>. This was after the cyclonic feature seen in <a
                        href=DonPer/2012/2012021608.html>SST and radar on 16 Feb</a> had moved a little west, but not
                    just
                    because of that. The beautiful SST image for <a href=DonPer/2012/2012022805.html>28 Feb</a> shows
                    the
                    possible influence of the cold, northward Capes Current.
                <li><h3>Perth, July 2012</h3> A cyclonic eddy was off Perth in <a href=SW/2012R00/20120704.html> early
                        July,
                        2012</a> forcing the strengthening Leeuwin up onto the upper slope. The <a
                        href=timeseries/ANMN_P3/WATR50-1205-Workhorse-ADCP-498.html>Two Rocks 500m ADCP</a> measured
                    very
                    strong southward flow in the upper 200m from 28 Jun to 16 July. The SST image for <a
                        href=DonPer/2012/2012070105.html>1 Jul</a> shows that the edge of the Leeuwin was just seaward
                    of
                    the mooring, while the <a href=DonPer/2012/DonPer201207.fli> animation for the month</a> shows how
                    the
                    passage of perturbations of the front were recorded consistently by both the ADCPs and the radar.
                <li><h3>Port Hedland, March 2012:</h3> Severe Tropical Cyclone <em>Lua</em> was off the shelf on <a
                        href=NW/2012R00/20120316.html>16 Mar</a>. The Pilbara line of ADCPs measured the resulting
                    subsurface flow speed to be quite weak, just 0.5m/s at 50m depth and 0.6m/s at 20m, over the <a
                        href=timeseries/ANMN_P3/PIL200-1202-Workhorse-ADCP-191p5.html> 200m</a> and <a
                        href=timeseries/ANMN_P3/PIL100-1202-Workhorse-ADCP-92.html> 100m</a> isobaths <a
                        href=NWS/2012/2012031617.html>[map view]</a>, presumably because the cyclone did not track along
                    the
                    shelf, but passed directly across it.
                <li><h3>Port Hedland, April 2012:</h3> High sea level at <a href=ht/2012R00/20120405.html> Darwin on 5
                        April</a> signalled the start of a large-scale south-westward flow along the north west shelf
                    that
                    had stronger current speed than the response to LC Lua and much longer-lived and complex in the
                    vertical
                    dimension <a href=NWS/2012/NWS201204.fli>[animation of April]</a>.
                <li><h3>Port Hedland, July 2012:</h3> Perhaps the most intriguing flows recorded by the <a
                        href=timeseries/ANMN_P3/PIL200-1202-Workhorse-ADCP-191p5.html>Pilbara</a> ADCPs (during their
                    first
                    6 month deployment) occurred during <a href=NWS/2012/NWS201207.fli>July 2012</a> after cold air <a
                        href=ht/2012R00/20120728.html>off the land</a> had cooled the inner-shelf waters, causing plumes
                    of
                    dense water to flow seaward. Many sub-mesoscale cyclonic eddies can be seen in the animation, e.g.
                    on <a
                        href=NWS/2012/2012072519.html>25 July</a>, including one with a drifter caught in it. Flows of
                    ~0.5m/s were measured by the ADCPs, providing valuable information to help us understand these small
                    features which are attracting oceanographers' attention for a number of reasons.
                <li><h3>Broome, March 2012:</h3> The inertial period at the latitude of the <a
                        href=timeseries/ANMN_P3/KIM400-1202-Workhorse-ADCP-389.html>Kimberley 400m ADCP</a> is 45h,
                    which is
                    the interval between the times when the flow velocity measured by the KIM400 ADCP at 50-70m was
                    directed
                    to the north-east, with magnitude of about 0.4m/s, on <a href=Broome/2012/2012031820.html>18</a>, <a
                        href=Broome/2012/2012032018.html>20</a> and <a href=Broome/2012/2012032216.html>22</a> March.
                    The <a
                        href=Broome/2012/Broome201203.fli>June animation</a> of those vectors shows the clockwise
                    rotation
                    of the velocity caused by the impulsive forcing by Severe Tropical Cyclone <em>Lua</em> on <a
                        href=NW/2012R00/20120316.html>16 Mar</a>. (Note that our sea level analysis is not intended to
                    represent such short-term events, when the assumption of geostrophy is violated, rendering the
                    inferred
                    velocities meaningless, so ignore the altimetric vectors on those maps).
                <li><h3>Darwin, May 2012:</h3> The strongest south-westward flow through the Timor Passage, as recorded
                    by the
                    <a href=timeseries/ANMN_P3/ITFTIS-1201-Workhorse-ADCP-456.html>ITFTIS 500m</a> ADCP in the upper
                    100m,
                    occurred around <a href=TimorP/2012/2012051306.html>13</a>-16 May, quite likely because of strong
                    easterly winds in the tropics associated the <a href=ht/2012R00/20120514.html>high pressure
                        system</a>
                    passing over the southern states. The strongest counterflow occurred between 150 and 300m,
                    especially
                    from 12-26 Feb, for which we can offer no explanation at present. The <a
                        href=TimorP/2012/TimorP201202.fli>SST animation</a> is unhelpful as usual in that region during
                    the
                    NW monsoon.
            </ul>
            </p>
        </article>
        <article>
            <h3>Strong northeastward currents on the SE Tasmanian shelf generate a lee eddy behind Tasman Island:- IMOS
                glider confirms a model prediction</h3> <a name=20130403><em>3-12 April 2013</em></a>
            <p><a href=misc/glider_SETAS_20130403.jpg><img src=misc/glider_SETAS_20130403.jpg width=25%></a>
                An IMOS Slocum glider sampling the Storm Bay line out from Hobart encountered extremely strong currents
                towards
                the NE recently, sweeping it up the Tasmanian coast towards Maria Island as shown at right. The glider's
                track
                also included a few unplanned loops. One of these was east of the southern tip of the Tasman Peninsula,
                over
                the
                mid-shelf between Tasman Island and the Hippolyte Rocks. A CSIRO experimental <a
                    href=misc/anim_setas_plan_20130403.fli>near-real-time model simulation</a> has an anti-cyclonic
                eddy, at
                about the same location as the glider's loop, that appears to be a topographic lee eddy resulting from
                the
                strong (nearly 1m/s) alongshelf flow streaming past the SE tip of the Tasman Peninsula. <a
                    href=http://www.emg.cmar.csiro.au/www/en/emg/projects/INFORMD/Near-Real-Time-Results/SE-Tas-Model.html>[more
                    about the model, and real-time output]</a> <a href="install.htm"> [animation won't play?]</a> <br>
            <h3>12 April update</h3> This <a href=misc/SETas_tp10m_t_Ex22720130407last14d.fli> [animation of model SST
                and
                'model drifters']</a> is a remarkably realistic-looking simulation of the situation, with some of the
            model
            drifters executing anti-clockwise loops on the shelf where the glider did its loops. Interestingly, the
            model
            predicts that if the glider had continued north in the cold current as far as the Freycinet Peninsula
            (42.2S),
            it might have sampled a very strange thing: a cold eddy rotating in the 'wrong' direction - anticlockwise.
            The
            explanation is that this cold water is also relatively fresh (about 35.1 at 60m according to the glider, in
            good
            agreement with the <a href=misc/SETas_sp60m_t_Ex22720130407last14d.fli> model</a>), so it is less dense, and
            therefore rotates anti-cyclonically. So an alternative explanation for the looped path of the glider is that
            it
            encountered one of the fresh eddies that the model predicts to be shed inshore of the sharp shelf-edge
            front.
            The lower salinity (relative to the EAC-influenced water offshore) of this fresher water on the Tasmanian
            shelf
            is not just from Tasmanian rivers, it is characteristic of waters south of the Sub-Tropical Front. For
            example,
            see nearby recent Argo profiles <a href=profiles/1901131/20130407_1901131_162_0406.html> west </a> and <a
                href=profiles/5901705/20130312_5901705_149_0313.html> east</a> of Tasmania showing sub-35 near-surface
            salinities.
            </p>
        </article>
        <article>
            <h3>First major upwelling of the season for the Bonney Coast</h3> <a name=20130306> <em>6,8 March, 15 April
                    2013</em></a>
            <p>
                The Bonney Coast (Portland, Vic, to Robe, SA) is possibly Australia's best-known upwelling hotspot with
                a
                well-documented upwelling season from December to March. The upwelling this year, however, has until
                recently
                been quite weak. The <a href=GAB/2013/20130301.html> sea level and pressure maps for 1 Mar</a>, <a
                    href=SAgulfs/2013/2013030317.html> SST image for 3 Mar</a> and <a href=SAgulfs_chl/2013/2013030504.html>
                    chl-a
                    image for 5 Mar</a> document the season's first really significant upwelling, with the usual
                features
                all
                present: a high atmospheric pressure system west of Tasmania caused strong SE winds along the Bonney
                Coast,
                which set the sea level down and thermocline up. Cold water surfaced where the shelf is narrowest. The
                injection
                of nutrients to the photic zone caused the phytoplankton to grow.
            <h3>15 April Update:</h3> HF radar data
            (for
            SAG, covering the shelf west of Kangaroo Island) have now been added to the SST maps, quantifying the speed
            and
            timing of the northwestward velocity that was already evident from visual inspection of the SST imagery. The
            flow speed was about 0.5m/s on 1 - <a href=SAgulfs/2013/2013030210.html>2 March </a>.
            </p>
        </article>
        <article>
            <h3>Ocean impact of STC Rusty monitored by IMOS gliders</h3> <em>28 Feb 2013 (updated 5 March)</em>
            <p> Severe Tropical Cyclone Rusty made landfall 100km east of Pt Hedland on 27 Feb 2013. An IMOS glider
                has
                recorded, for the first time in Australian waters, the impact on various water properties under cyclonic
                forcing
                conditions. Possibly the most notable of these impacts is that turbidity exceeded the intrument's range
                all
                the
                way to 30m (the bottom), as shown in Fig. 10 of a <a href=misc/KimberleyGlider_vsTCRusty1.pdf> WAIMOS
                    note </a>.
                The impact of the cyclone is also clear in MODIS estimates of the <a href=MODIScomp/2013/2013030306.html>chlorophyll-a
                    concentration on 3 March</a>, which show a 250km-long plume extending seaward from the coast, <a
                    href=NW/2013/20130227.html>south-west</a> of the (clockwise-directed) winds.
            </p>
            <p>Tide gauges at Broome, Port Hedland and <a href=http://www.transport.wa.gov.au/imarine/19264.asp>Cape
                    Lambert</a> have also recorded the impact on sea level but this does not appear to have been large,
                relative to the large tidal range of the Pilbara coast. The elevated sea level, however, is expected to
                travel southwards along the Australian continental margin as a <a href=glossary.htm#CTW>Coastal Trapped
                    Wave</a>, raising sea level by about 0.4m above the tidal prediction at <a
                    href=misc/plot_009265_latest.png><img src=misc/plot_009265_latest.png width=25%>Perth on 1-3
                    March</a> , according to the <a href=http://www.bom.gov.au/oceanography/forecasts/index.shtml>Bureau
                    of
                    Meteorology ocean model forecast</a>, as shown at right.
            </p>
        </article>
        <article>
            <h3>Strong upwelling in North-Eastern Bass Strait</h3>
            <em>25 Feb 2013 (updated 6 March)</em>
            <p><img src=misc/AlgalBloomBewareReef27-2-2013.jpeg width=25%> The far eastern coast of Victoria
                has one of Australia's upwelling 'hotspots'. An example of intense localised upwelling occurred in the
                last
                few
                weeks, starting on
                <a href=Syd-Hob/2013/2013021315.html>13 Feb</a>. The signal is clear off Marlo (longitude 148.5&#176E)
                by <a
                    href=Syd-Hob/2013/2013021516.html>15 Feb</a>. According to satellite imagery, SST reached a minimum
                of
                16&#176C on <a href=Syd-Hob/2013/2013021705.html>17 Feb</a> and the cold plume extended 80 km to the
                south
                west.
                Observers at nearby Beware Reef measured surface temperatures as low as 15&#176C. The cold upwelling
                triggered a
                phytoplankton bloom that was clearly evident in a <a href=Syd-Hob_chl/2013/2013022204.html>MODIS chl-a image
                    for
                    21
                    Feb</a> and even more evident to the Beware Reef diver pictured, who noted only a few m visual range
                down to
                20m where it was quite dark, and only 12&#176C. The upwelling event appears to be due to the combined
                effect
                of
                1) the local wind which was upwelling-favourable from 10 Feb, and 2) dynamic uplift from the along-shelf
                flows
                associated with a warm-core EAC eddy. The event has been simulated quite well in near-real time using
                the
                Bluelink-developed nested-model system but the dynamics have not yet been fully explored. <a
                    href=http://www.marine.csiro.au/~cahill/OC_NEWS/Eden/Sgif/>[model estimates of SST and currents]</a>
                <em>Photo
                    credit: Friends of Beware Reef</em>.
            </p>
        </article>
        <article>
            <h3>The Sydney-Hobart yacht race:- pre-race notes on the ocean currents</h3>
            <em>20,24 Dec 2012</em>
            <p>Firstly, a reminder of a change to the way we are showing the strength of the surface current for
                panels
                such as the one for <a href=Syd-Hob/latest.html>Sydney-Hobart</a>. We have opted to double the number,
                in
                the
                east-west direction, of current vectors but halve the scale factor. So a 1kt current now shows as a
                shorter
                arrow, as indicated by the key. Bear this in mind if you compare this year's maps with previous years'
                ones.
            </p>
            <p> Now, the state of the East Australian current and its eddies: The 'speed hump' in Bass Strait that
                presented
                navigators with a difficult decision last year is not there this year. Instead, the rhumbline appears to
                be
                fairly free of any strong currents as far as we can tell from the latest satellite information. To the
                east
                of the rhumbline there is some favourable current clearly evident in the latest images so the warm,
                anticlockwise-rotating eddy is a feature worth watching in the next few days. There appears to have been
                a
                northward flow on the continental shelf of north-east Tasmania (as evidenced by the plume of cold water
                streaming north from Eddystone Pt) in the last few days but this feature is unlikely to persist until
                race
                day. The situation between Sydney and Cape Howe is very complex this year. There are two small cyclonic
                (clockwise rotating) eddies off the continental shelf, so the flow is adverse in places seaward of the
                200m
                isobath. Over the shelf, however, there was evidently a favourable flow of about 1kt on 15 Dec, as can
                be
                seen from the <a href=Syd-Hob/2012/2012121504.html>southward drift of a satellite-tracked buoy</a>. The
                thermal imagery for <a href=SNSW/2012/2012121903.html>19 Dec</a> suggests there was a narrow warm stream
                flowing south past Jervis Bay over the outer continental shelf. It is unclear from the altimetry what
                the
                speed of the flow was. Navigators should watch the imagery for any evidence of this flow persisting til
                race
                time, which is quite possible but certainly not guaranteed. As usual, we wish all competitors an
                exciting
                but safe race and apologize in advance if the imagery on our website stops updating at any point due to
                a
                computer failure while our IT staff enjoy their holidays.
            </p>
        </article>
        <article>
            <h3>An even-higher sea level event in the Great Australian Bight</h3> <em>29 August 2012</em>
            <p>Sea level in the GAB was about 1.8m above MSL at high tide on 23 August 2012. The low-pass filtered,
                barometrically-adjusted coastal sea level anomaly we used in our sea level mapping briefly reached 0.8m,
                topping
                the June value discussed below to become the highest (sub-tidal) sea level anomaly recorded in southern
                Australia this winter. It was caused by a deep low-pressure system that passed over Tasmania on <a
                    href=GAB/2012/20120824.html>25 August</a>. The wind had a strong on-shore component at times, and
                the
                effect
                of this can be seen in the <a href=SAgulfs/2012/2012082412.html>24 August data from the HF radar</a>,
                which
                senses the total near-surface current velocity. But why is the along-shore component of the radar
                velocity
                clearly less than the estimate derived (by geostrophy) from the sea level maps? The answer to this
                probably
                includes several considerations. One, demonstrated so clearly off Perth in June, is that strong onshore
                winds
                raise coastal sea level ageostrophically, i.e., the sea level slope sets up to balance the force of the
                wind.
                Geostrophy, in contrast, is when the sea level slope is in equilibrium with the Coriolis force acting on
                the
                along-shore component of flow. This balance takes longer to establish than the set-up due to wind, which
                is
                why
                we low-pass filter the coastal sea level before inferring the alongshore flow from the map of sea level.
                It
                may
                be that in this case this approach did not remove enough of the sea level slope due to the onshore
                component
                of
                wind, yielding an erroneously-high estimate of the flow speed. Another possibility is that the altimeter
                estimates of low (-0.2m off Eyre Peninsula) sea level at the edge of the shelf were erroneous due to
                incomplete
                correction for the effects that large waves have on those measurements.
            </p>
        </article>
        <article>
            <h3>The Day the East Australian Current vanished</h3> <a name=20120813><em>13 August 2012</em></a>
            <p>Now you see it <a href=Brisbane/2012/2012080803.html><img src=Brisbane/2012/2012080803.gif width=15%
                                                                         align=left>[8 Aug 2012]</a>, now you don't:
                <a
                    href=Brisbane/2012/2012081422.html><img src=Brisbane/2012/2012081422.gif width=15%>[14 Aug 2012]</a>.
                What made the thin streak of warm EAC water south of Coffs Harbour suddenly disappear? Two things
                happened
                between 8 and 14 Aug, as shown in the larger-scale map for <a href=SE/2012/20120811.html>11 Aug 2012</a>.
                One is
                that the cold core eddy at 30S 155E, over the continental slope off Coffs Harbour, was restricting the
                southward
                flow of the East Australian Current at that point, so most of the flow went offshore around a big warm
                core
                eddy
                centered off Byron Bay. The consequence of this is that the thin streak of warm water south of Coffs was
                probably quite shallow. The other thing happening was that an atmospheric low pressure system was off
                NSW,
                centered at 34S 159E on 11 Aug. Strong southerly winds drive coastal currents northward and raise
                coastal
                sea
                level, as shown in the tidegauge data, but that would not change the surface temperature away from the
                coast.
                The cold southerlies cool the warm surface layer by extracting heat, but possibly more importantly, also
                by
                increasing the surface turbulence, mixing warm shallow layers with the water beneath. In summary, we
                think
                that
                the winds being so strong, and the flow volume so reduced, are what made the surface exression of the
                EAC
                off
                NSW disappear so fast. <a href=Brisbane/2012/2012082222.html>22 August update</a>: a fresh nose of warm
                surface
                waters can now be seen flowing south again between Coffs and the eddy offshore.
            <h3> April 2013 update:</h3>
            The
            <a href=timeseries/ANMN_P3/CH070-1207-Workhorse-ADCP-68p5.html>CH070 </a> and <a
                href=timeseries/ANMN_P3/CH100-1207-Workhorse-ADCP-97p9.html> CH100</a> ADCPs certainly recorded the
            northward current pulse but no temperature rise at the bottom due to vertical mixing is evident.
            </p>
        </article>
        <article>
            <h3>Extremely high sea level at Perth and in the Great Australian Bight</h3> <a name=20120618><em>18 June
                    2012</em></a>
            <p><a href=misc/Hillarys201206.png><img src=misc/Hillarys201206.png width=25%></a> <a
                    href=misc/FremantleBH201206.png><img src=misc/FremantleBH201206.png width=25%></a> On 10, <a
                    href=GAB/2012/20120611.html>11</a> and 13 June 2012, the Bureau of Meteorology National Tidal
                Facility
                tide
                gauge at Hillarys, Perth, recorded non-tidal sea level anomalies of up to 0.8m above mean sea level. The
                WA
                Department of Transport tide gauge at Fremantle Boat Harbour recorded a similar surge but also a
                ~3h-period
                oscillation that contributed to the highest sea level ever recorded at Fremantle: 1.35m above mean sea
                level.
                Fortunately, these surges came at neap tide (click images to expand - Hillarys data courtesy of <a
                    href=http://www.bom.gov.au/oceanography/projects/ntc/ntc.shtml>BoM</a>, Fremantle data and image
                courtesy of
                <a href=http://www.transport.wa.gov.au/imarine/19263.asp>WA DoT</a>). The total sea level might have
                been an
                additional 0.3m otherwise (e.g., if it had occurred during the high spring tide a few days earlier). Low
                atmospheric pressure was a contributor to the high sea level but strong onshore (westerly) winds
                associated
                with
                the low pressure systems passing south of the mainland was the main cause. A consequence of these strong
                winds
                being onshore rather than alongshore is that they would not (in contrast to the <a
                    href=glossary.htm#geostrophic>geostrophic</a> sea level-based estimates shown on our <a
                    href=DonPer/2012/2012061105.html> map</a>) have generated particularly strong along-shore currents.
                This
                will be confirmed when the radar data processing resumes. Along the southern coast of Australia, where
                the
                winds
                blew along the shelf rather than across it, they generated a 0.75m non-tidal sea level anomaly on <a
                    href=GAB/2012/20120614.html>14 June 2012</a> at Thevenard, where such events are more common. The
                surge
                has
                now passed through Portland, Vic (non-tidal anomaly 0.3m) and will possibly also be measurable soon east
                of
                Bass
                Strait. <br>
            <h3>P.S.</h3>: An <a href=misc/Perthshelf1_hat_3d2012.fli>animation</a> of the CSIRO Bluelink model
            simulation of
            the event, as a 3D perspective (viewed from the SE) of the sea level anomaly. The fit to the <a
                href=misc/FBH.gif>time-history</a> of the (independent) Fremantle sea level observations is remarkable.
            </p>
        </article>
        <article>
            <h3>A radar view of an intense cold eddy off Perth</h3> <em>9 June 2012</em>
            <p>Since <a href=DonPer/2012/2012052906.html> 29 May 2012 </a>, a satellite-tracked surface drifter has
                remained within a small eddy of cold water that we can see off Perth using satellites and the IMOS HF
                radar.
                The
                drifter has made several clockwise orbits of the eddy center but the radius of these orbits is so small
                (~10km)
                that the frequency of the position fixes are sometimes inadequate. The clockwise rotation of these very
                small
                eddies has been seen before in SST imagery and by drifters but this recent example is the first we have
                seen
                in
                real-time using HF radar. The tight radius of the eddy is well-resolved by the radar and the
                correspondence
                of
                the radar data with the SST imagery is <a href=DonPer/2012/2012052820.html> striking</a>. We have
                coloured
                the
                radar vectors according to whether the surface velocity field is divergent, neutral (|div(v)|&lt; 5E-6/s) or
            convergent. Trapping of drifters in features has often been taken to signal the existence of a convergent
            surface layer, and therefore downwelling, but the recent sequence of events has not yet yielded a simple
            interpretation. The cold eddy is the remains of an elongated cold feature sandwiched on <a
                href=CLeeu/2012/2012052720.html>27 May</a> between the warm eddy offshore, and warm water over the
            shelf.
            The eddy is now just a 'hole' in the surrounding region of warm water. We are interested in these features
            because many items such as fish and lobster larvae might also become aggregated in convergent eddies.<br>
            <h3>P.S.:</h3> Animations of <a href=misc/DonPer201205.AVI>radar and SST (AVI format)</a>, <a
                href=misc/DonPer201205.fli>radar and SST (fli format)</a>, <a
                href=misc/ROT_2012_7h_non-QC_Divergence2012.AVI>radar only (AVI format)</a>, <a
                href=misc/ROT_2012_7h_non-QC_Divergence2012.fli>radar only (fli format)</a>.
            </p>
        </article>
        <article>
            <h3>Warm beach temperatures at Sydney</h3> <em>11 May 2012</em>
        </article>
        <article> Sydney beachgoers are wondering why the ocean is so warm at the moment <a
                href=http://www.smh.com.au/environment/weather/come-in-sydney-the-waters-sublime-20120510-1yfor.html
                target="blank">[Sydney Morning Herald]</a>. The answer is <em>not</em> that the whole Tasman Sea is
            warm. In
            fact, the only places that are warmer than usual for this time of year are quite close to Sydney. Much of
            the
            ocean between Sydney and New Zealand is significantly colder (by a degree or two) than usual <a
                href=sst_anom/2012/20120506.html>[SST anomaly]</a>. So why is it so warm near Sydney? The satellite
            image
            for <a href=LordHoweS/2012/2012042502.html>25 April</a> shows the East Australian Current streaming down the
            NSW
            continental shelf, with warm (23&#176C) water right up against the coast in places, as far as Woolongong
            where
            it went offshore, looping around a 100km-diameter anticyclonic eddy before rejoining the parent flow. The
            appearance of cooler eddies south of headlands is a clear sign of rapid southward flow along the coast.
            Animation <a href=misc/LordHoweS20120510last14d.fli>[fli format]</a> <a
                href=misc/LordHoweS20120510last14d.AVI>[avi
                format]</a> of the available images for following days shows how the along-shore flow of the EAC was
            interrupted as a cold-core, cyclonic eddy moved in from the deep ocean to the continental slope and shelf.
            By <a
                href=LordHoweS/2012/2012050815.html>[8 May]</a>, the EAC had changed course at Port Macquarie, with all
            of
            the EAC water flowing off the shelf into the deep ocean, isolating the anticyclonic eddy centered off Sydney
            from the rest of the EAC. This is the usual course of the EAC eddy-shedding process. It is not every time,
            however, that this process results in the inner shelf being flooded by warm EAC water. Strong flows of EAC
            water
            normally remain a bit farther offshore, so NSW beach temperatures are usually a few degrees lower than mid-
            or
            outer shelf temperatures. A common reason for sudden cooling is north-easterly winds, which, due to the
            rotation
            of the Earth, drive surface waters to the left, away from the coast, drawing the colder subsurface waters to
            the
            surface. Southerly or southwesterly winds have the opposite effect: they push the warm water up against the
            coast. The southerlies of late April - early May are surely a factor in the present case.
            </p>
        </article>
        <article>
            <h3>High sea level on Vic, NSW and Qld coasts, 8-15 April 2012</h3> <a name=20120420> <em>20 April 2012</em></a>
        </article>
        <article> A wave of high sea level propagated northwards along the entire east Australian coast from <a
                href=GAB/2012/20120408.html>Bass Strait on 8 April</a> through <a href=SE/2012/20120410.html>NSW on 10
                April</a>, <a href=NE/2012/20120413.html> SE Qld on 13 April</a> to <a href=NE/2012/20120415.html> Cape
                York
                on 15 April</a>. It was the result of winds associated with a high pressure system that developed in the
            Great Australian Bight. This system developed farther south than normal for April, at a latitude more
            typical
            for summer-time systems (so it did not cause strong westerlies in the GAB). Unlike a summer system, however,
            it
            then tracked onto the SE mainland and up towards Qld. The result was that strong westerly winds off Vic
            preceded
            strong southerlies off NSW and strong south-easterlies off Qld. There is a class of low-frequency (period of
            days or longer), large-scale (100's km wavelength) ocean wave known as a Topographic Rossby wave, or Coastal
            Trapped Wave that propagates along continental shelves with the coast on the left in the southern hemisphere
            (i.e. northwards on the east coast) at a few hundred km per day depending on the depth profile of the shelf.
            They are generated by the along-shore component of the wind and reach largest amplitudes when the
            translocation
            of the strong winds matches the speed of the wave. This recent event appears to be a classic example of the
            local response to the wind being compounded by a Coastal Trapped Wave. The result was that sea level was
            about
            0.5m higher than expected for a day or two in places, something that only happens once or twice, if at all,
            each
            year. A northward shift of the prevailing current, of possibly 0.5m/s for a day or two, might have also
            occurred
            over the continental shelf but this is yet to be confirmed. Downwelling of the thermocline over the
            continental
            slope may also have occurred, especially near topographic irregularities such as Fraser Island. <h3>18 March
                2013
                Update:</h3> ANMN mooring data clearly show that the anomalous northward pulse was indeed about 0.5m/s
            as
            anticipated, off Sydney around 10 April, as shown in the depth-time plots of <a
                href=timeseries/ANMN_P3/SYD100-1204-Workhorse-ADCP-99p5.html>SYD100 </a> , <a
                href=timeseries/ANMN_P3/SYD140-1202-Workhorse-ADCP-137p5.html>SYD140</a> and <a
                href=timeseries/ANMN_P3/CH070-1203-Workhorse-ADCP-72p9.html>CH070</a> ADCP data. These data are also
            shown
            now in the <a href=SNSW/2012/2012041009.html>map view</a>. <h3>2 July 2013 Update:</h3> The northward pulse
            was
            also recorded <a href=timeseries/ANMN_P5/GBROTE-1203-Workhorse-ADCP-48.html> off Heron Island, SGBR, on 13
                April
                2012</a> <a href=SGBR/2012/2012041314.html>[map view]</a>.
            </p>
        </article>
        <article>
            <h3>Cold water at Byron Bay</h3> <em>1,2 March 2012</em>
        </article>
        <article> Many of the recent SST images for the NSW-Qld coast are badly affected by cloud but it is clearly
            apparent
            (e.g.<a href=Brisbane2/2012/2012022818.html> 28 Feb</a>, <a href=Brisbane2/2012/2012030115.html> 1 Mar</a>)
            that
            cold water is upwelling from the deep and surfacing at the coast. This process occurs regularly on the NSW
            shelf
            but not often as strongly as at present, or as far north as Byron Bay, where a <a
                href="http://mhl.nsw.gov.au/www/wave_temp_byron.htmlx" target='blank'> wave buoy </a> has recorded a
            temperature drop of 4&#176 (to 21&#176) . This temperature drop coincides with the arrival at the edge of
            the
            continental shelf of a cold-core cyclonic eddy, that happens to have an Argo profiler in it <a
                href=profiles/5903933/20120221_5903933_9_0223.html>[21 Feb
                profile]</a>,
            confirming that the temperature structure is displaced upwards by nearly 200m. This would drop the
            temperature
            at the edge of the shelf from 20&#176 to 15&#176, while also interupting the southward flow along the shelf
            edge
            of the East Australian Current [<a href=SE/2012/20120224.html>24 Feb altimetry map]</a>.
            </p>
        </article>
        <article>
            <h3>Tasmanian beaches: as warm as Bondi? </h3> <em>11 Jan 2012</em>
        </article>
        <article>Ocean surface temperatures are presently 18 to 19&#176C off <a href=Tas/2012/2012010815.html> eastern
                Tasmania</a>, which is about <a href=sst_anom/2012/20120106.html>3&#176 above normal</a>. The same (or
            lower) temperature was recorded at Bondi Beach on Boxing Day 2011, but there it is about 3&#176
            <em>below</em>
            normal. The explanation for the levelling of the beach temperatures is probably as follows: the relatively
            cold
            Sydney temperature was the result of the combined influence of <a href=glossary.htm#upwelling>upwelling-favourable </a>
            north-easterly winds and the departure from the shelf, <a href=SNSW/2011/2011122518.html>just north of
                Sydney</a>, of the East Australian Current (as noted below). The warm Tasmanian temperatures are due in
            some
            measure to the presence off Tasmania of the large warm-core eddy that has come slowly south from NSW, even
            though the core temperature of that eddy is not high at the surface. <h3>Update:</h3> The southward flow of
            warm
            water continued through February, with the greatest positive anomaly occurring in the week of <a
                href=sst_anom/2012/20120225.html>25 Feb</a> when weather conditions compounded the effect of the local
            current, as shown in this short <a href=misc/Tas20120223p3d.fli>animation</a>.
            </p>
        </article>
        <article>
            <h3>Sydney to Hobart yachtsmen: mind the speedhump in Bass Strait</h3> <em>20 December 2011</em>
        </article>
        <article>If our most recent current maps are any indication of what competitors will encounter in this year's
            Sydney-to-Hobart race, one of the key decisions might be whether to stick to the rhumbline and endure a weak
            adverse current in Bass Strait, or whether to try and pick up a stronger (possibly 2kt) tail current by
            going
            wide of Cape Howe. The more eastern route might also position yachts to pick up some tail current off
            Tasmania.
            The strong flow off southern NSW is the inside edge of a warm-core eddy shed from the East Australian
            Current in
            September. The eddy presently off Tasmania is the remnant of the very strong eddy formed off Sydney in <a
                href=SE/2011/20110301.html>March</a>. The EAC is well east of Sydney at present, so strong currents are
            not
            evidently affecting the region from Sydney to Ulladulla. The flows may change over the next few days,
            however,
            so navigators are advised, as always, to watch for updates.
            </p>
        </article>
        <article>
            <h3>The Leeuwin Current and East Australian Current are both still extremely strong</h3> <em>9 December
                2011</em>
        </article>
        <article> Both of Australia's major boundary currents were stronger than usual in 2011. Off Perth, the strong
            Leeuwin Current caused water temperatures to be more than 4 degrees warmer than usual from <a
                href=sst_anom/2011/20110204.html>February</a> to <a href=sst_anom/2011/20110414.html>April</a>. The
            strong
            flow continued into the <a href=RechEyre/2011/2011062417.html>Great Australian Bight </a> where it created
            several very energetic warm core eddies, with flow speeds reaching 0.6m/s at times, according to
            satellite-tracked drifting buoys. Temperatures are a few degrees higher than usual <a
                href=sst_anom/2011/20111204.html>at present</a> off SW Australia, and the Leeuwin is rounding <a
                href=AlbEsp/2011/2011112505.html>Cape Leeuwin</a> as a powerful current, billowing seaward at several
            places
            instead of relaxing as it often does at this time of year. From Brisbane to Sydney, the strong East
            Australian
            Current early in the year produced the most energetic warm-core eddy measured by satellite altimetry off SE
            Australia. In <a href=SE/2011/20110301.html>March </a> the eddy was off southern NSW. Its waters are now
            evident
            south of <a href=Tas/2011/2011120105.html>Tasmania</a>.
            </p>
        </article>
        <article>
            <h3>Extreme eddies off Sydney</h3> <a name=20110122><em>22 January 2011</em></a>
        </article>
        <article>Two extremely large ocean eddies are off Sydney at the moment, one warm, the other cold. The warm eddy
            is
            composed of a large mass of East Australian Current water that has been flowing very fast south from Qld for
            some time now, and is about to pinch off from the parent current to form an isolated eddy. The pinching-off
            process is associated with the westward movement of a huge and very energetic cold-core eddy, which we
            detect
            from space as a 150km-diameter area of low (-0.6m) sealevel <a href=SE/2011/20110117.html>[map for 17
                Jan]</a>.
            As this comes ever closer to the continental shelf between Newcastle and Port Macquarie, very cold water
            might
            upwell at the coast, from Port Stephens to Sydney, especially if there are winds from the NE to assist the
            process. If the warm eddy now off Sydney shifts southward then the present low coastal temperatures south of
            Jervis Bay will be replaced by high ones. This whole chain of events has been seen many times before, but
            not
            ever this strongly, from memory. Results of a quantitative analysis will be announced when they are
            available.
            <h3>18 March 2013 Update:</h3> ANMN mooring data <a
                href=timeseries/ANMN_P3/SYD140-1012-Workhorse-ADCP-137p5.html>[depth-time
                plot of SYD140 ADCP]</a> <a href=timeseries/ANMN_P3/SYD100-1012-Workhorse-ADCP-103p5.html> [SYD100]</a>
            clearly show the impact on coastal currents of the eddy coming up onto the inner shelf, as also seen in the
            <a
                href=SNSW/2011/2011011606.html>[SST map for 16 Jan 2011]</a>.
            </p>
        </article>
        <article>
            <h3> Rolex Sydney Hobart 2010: </h3> <em>27 December 2010</em>
        </article>
        <article>The main body of the East Australian Current was too far offshore to affect the early segment of the
            race
            <a href=misc/SH2010.htm>[Google Earth screen-grabs]</a>. As the yachts passed the NSW/Vic border, however,
            they
            had the choice of northward flowing cold water over the continental shelf, or southward flowing warm water
            outside the 200m isobath. Most of the leading boats chose the warm water but from halfway across Bass
            Strait,
            this is not flowing towards Hobart, but veering east. Cold water on the Tasmanian continental shelf is
            flowing
            northwards but probably not very quickly.
            </p>
        </article>
        <article>
            <h3> Delayed impact of Ului on Barrier Reef</h3> <em>July 13 2010</em>
        </article>
        <article>The cyclonic eddy generated by STC "Ului" has now reached the northern GBR.
            </p>
        </article>
        <article>
            <h3>update on STC "Ului"</h3> <em>May 21, 2010</em>
        </article>
        <article>The cyclonic eddy generated by Ului in March has now <a href=NE/2010/20100516.html>[16 May]</a>, after
            2
            months, travelled half the distance from its origin to the coast. Strong northward currents north of Cairns
            can
            be expected as the eddy comes closer, as happened (even more so) in the aftermath to TC Andrew in <a
                href=NE/1997R1/19970410.html>[April 1997]</a>.
            </p>
        </article>
        <article>
            <h3>update on Sydney</h3> <em>May 18 2010</em>
        </article>
        <article>Beach water temperatures are still extremely high but the East Australian Current has now started to
            flow
            mostly away from the continental shelf at the latitude of Sydney, rather than towards the coast (as it has
            since
            late April), triggering the beginning of the end of the high temperatures. The explanation is faily complex:
            Between Sydney and Newcastle a clockwise-rotating, cold-core eddy has now become well established inshore of
            the
            EAC. Until the last few days, the EAC was flowing south around this cold-core eddy, feeding into a large
            pool of
            EAC water that is warmer than is normally seen off southern NSW at this time of year: <a
                href=sst_anom/2010/20100512.html>[difference from average for 12 May]</a>.
            The cold-core eddy has now grown so large that very little of the EAC is continuing south: most appears to
            be
            flowing offshore at the critical junction point at 34.5S, 152.5E: <a href=SNSW/2010/2010051619.html>[imagery
                for
                16 May]</a>. To complete this eddy-shedding process, the cold-core eddy off Newcastle is likely to merge
            with the larger cold-core eddy to the SE, thereby completely separating the two masses of warm EAC water:
            the
            parent body to the NE, and the newly-shed body to the south. <h3>Update:</h3> The eddy shedding is now
            complete:
            <a href=SNSW/2010/2010051917.html>[19 May]</a><br>
            <a href=misc/SNSW20100520last14d.AVI>[23MByte animation of 6-20 May]</a>
            </p>
        </article>
        <article>
            <h3>Beachtime for Sydney</h3> <em>April 29 2010</em>
        </article>
        <article>Swimmers at Sydney's beaches enjoyed water temperatures several degrees warmer than usual for a few
            days,
            courtesy of the East Australian Current coming very close to the coast at Sydney after flowing around a
            small
            cold feature off Newcastle. <br>
            <a href=SNSW/2010/2010042903.html>[satellite imagery for 29 April]</a>
            <a href=misc/SNSW20100506last14d.AVI>[23MByte animation].</a>
            </p>
        </article>
        <article>
            <h3> Severe Tropical Cyclone "Ului" </h3> <em>March 25 2010</em>
        </article>
        <article>Ului remained near 13S 159E from <a href=NE/2010/20100316.html>[15-18 March]</a>, allowing for much
            transfer of momentum to one region of the ocean. The low atmospheric pressure raised sea level but the
            induced
            cyclonic rotation reduced it.
            Once the cyclone moved on, the cyclonic rotation and low sea level of the ocean remained:
            <a href=NE/2010/20100320.html>[20 March]</a>.
            The SST imagery is not good but the reduction of temperature at the centre of the eddy can be seen.
            </p>
        </article>
        <article>
            <h3><em>Centaur</em>- success! </h3> <a name=20091220><em>December 20, 2009</em></a>
        </article>
        <article>The Centaur has been found, proving that the survivors did indeed drift slowly north-eastwards (19nm
            over
            34h is just 0.6kt) before being found where they were. It appears, therefore, that an eddy similar to the
            one NE
            of Cape Morton on <a href=misc/Centaur20091208.AVI> [8 Dec 2009]</a> must have been off Point Lookout on 14
            May
            1943. Had such an eddy not been there, and the flow more similar to how it was on <a
                href=misc/Centaur20091015dw.AVI> [15 Oct 2009]</a>, survivors could have been swept as far south as
            Evan's
            Head, resulting in fewer being found if they became stretched over a larger area, or taken farther offshore.
            </p>
        </article>
        <article>
            <h3><em>Centaur</em> update.</h3> <em>December 16, 2009</em>
        </article>
        <article> Imagery off Brisbane has been very poor since the start of the search. <a href=Brisbane2/latest.html>[latest
                image]</a>
            </p>
        </article>
        <article>
            <h3>Eddy off Brisbane - good news for <em>Centaur</em> search</h3>
            <em>December 8 2009</em>
            <p>The upwelled water off Fraser Island has become a cold-core eddy, around which the East Australian
                Current
                has been deviating. The flow is seen by animating a few high-quality SST images that weather conditions
                made
                possible on <a href=misc/Centaur20091208.AVI> [8 Dec]</a>. The (fairly rare) flow deviation is a welcome
                development for <a href=http://www.thepremier.qld.gov.au/initiatives/centaur-search/search-diary.aspx
                                   target=blank> David Mearns </a> who is searching for AHS <em>Centaur</em>.
            </p>
        </article>
        <article>
            <h3><a href=Brisbane2/2009/2009120410.html> Strong upwelling</a> off Fraser Island </h3> <em>December 4
                2009</em>
        </article>
        <article>
            <p>This upwelling has been caused by three factors: 1) the recent northerly winds, 2) a warm-core eddy
                driving very strong southward flow (with an onshore bottom Ekman layer) near the tip of Fraser Island,
                and 3) a
                westward-moving cold-core eddy centred at 26S 155E on <a href=Brisbane2/2009/2009111210.html> 12
                    November </a>
                causing uplift of the isotherms (see Argo profiles on <a
                    href=profiles/5900750/20091108_5900750_168_1108.html>8</a> and <a
                    href=profiles/5900750/20091127_5900750_170_1127.html> 27</a> November).
            </p>
        </article>
        <article>
            <h3>Cold-core eddy off Ningaloo: </h3><em>June-August 2007</em>
            <p>Cold core eddies do frequently form off Ningaloo Reef, but few are as strong as this one: <a
                    href=misc/Ningaloo2007.AVI>[animation of SST June and August]</a>
            </p>
        </article>
        <article>
            <h3>Cold-core eddy off Sydney </h3>
            <em>March 21 2007</em>
            <p>An especially strong cold core eddy off Sydney: <a href=misc/Syd20070315.fli>[fli animation of SST March
                    14-15]</a> <a href=misc/Syd20070315.AVI>[.AVI format]</a> <a
                    href=http://www.csiro.au/news/ps2vi.html>[News
                    item]</a></p>
        </article>
    </div>

<?php
include("include/footer.php");
?>
