Archived page: information
on this page is no longer updated and may contain broken links and outdated
information.
CSIRO Marine and Atmospheric
Research
Past Seminars
Seminar Abstract
Friday 18 March 2005, 11.30am (Tas time)
CSIRO Auditorium, Hobart and via videoconference to CMR
Floreat and Cleveland
Dr Stuart Godfrey
CSIRO Marine Research
What sets the heat flux into the tropical Indian Ocean?
Climatologies all agree that there is a substantial net
heat flux into the tropical Indian Ocean. This implies that SST is colder
than it would be if there were no heat flux, with consequent effects on
evaporation and hence on Asian monsoon rainfall. However, the magnitude
of the net heat flux varies widely among climatologies; and all ocean
models published so far require heat fluxes which are below most climatologies.
The oceanographic problem is made more complex by the massive size of
seasonal cycle of wind stress, and hence of ocean currents. To simplify
the problem, we split it into two by comparing two runs of a coarse-grid
global OGCM — one ("control") with full seasonal and interannual
variations of all relevant atmospheric variables, and a second ("12MRM")
in which the wind stress (only) is replaced at each point and time by
its 12-month running mean. Currents in the latter run are relatively slow,
and in Sverdrup balance.
The difference in Indian Ocean area-mean heat flux between the runs,
north of the Indonesian Throughflow at 7°S, is surprisingly small
(6/watts/m2 compared to 28 w/m2 in the Control run). This encourages the
idea that the tropical Indian Ocean heat flux is primarily driven in the
model by the Levitus (1988) mechanism — southward annual mean Ekman
transport is replaced by a colder, deeper geostrophic inflow, demanding
a surface heat flux to replace the southward heat transport. The longterm
mean difference flow between the two runs is only 1.3 Sv, but it enters
at depths below about 500m, and it warms by some 16°C before exiting
in the surface mixed layer. This is about enough to advect the interrun
difference in heat flux southward. Thus deep-reaching differences in diapycnal
mixing are crucial to understanding the interrun difference. Qualitatively,
this interrun difference in annual mean mixing strength and depth comes
about because currents in the seasonal run are stronger, giving rise to
more mixing — a kind of "rectification" of the seasonal
currents. However, the details are rather obscure, due to limitations
of the model used. Another feature of these two runs is that interesting
interrun flow differences occur across the equator; we suggest that the
observed annual mean eastward jet along the equator in the top 100m is
primarily driven by nonlinear effects associated with the seasonal Wyrtki
Jets.
To explore such issues without the coarse-grid limitations, we also studied
the heat flux problem in a fine-grid, idealised model of the tropical
Indian Ocean. This consisted of a cross-equatorial rectangular box with
a gap for the Indonesian Throughflow, and a shallow outlet at the southern
boundary to let Ekman flow pass out of the region. Winds are idealised
to have Ekman and Sverdrup transports be equal; in most runs we impose
a steady 10 Sverdrups upwelling at the northern wall. We find that the
net heat flux into this tropical "Indian Ocean" is remarkably
insensitive to parameterisation of diapycnal mixing, because a simple
nonlinear constraint places a lower limit on the possible depth of the
geostrophic inflow. For a 10 Sv cross-equatorial Ekman flow, this lower
limit is about 200m. It seems that diapycnal diffusivities have to be
very high before the model can depart much from this minimum depth. Yet
if it is close to that limit, our experience so far suggests that the
mixing is probably not physically realistic, but is instead generated
by numerical artefacts of one kind or another.
If time permits, we will briefly explore some of the issues raised by
these results, and discuss preliminary attempts to circumvent these problems.
[Back to Seminars]
CSIRO = Marine Laboratories Auditorium, Castray Esplanade,
Hobart
For further information, or to schedule a seminar, contact:
Peter Oke,
(Oceanographic seminars) CSIRO Marine Research (03) 6232 5387
Piers Dunstan,
(Biological seminars) CSIRO Marine Research (03) 6232 5382
Katrina Nitschke,
Antarctic Climate and
Ecosystems CRC
(03) 6226 2265 & IASOS,
University of Tasmania (03) 6226 2509
|