The table below provides basic information about the float, including primary sensors, mission parameters and current status of profiles.
Institute | CSIRO |
Principal Investigator | Susan Wijffels |
Pressure Sensor | Druck (serial number=2657718174) |
CTD Sensor | APEX-SBE-41 (serial number=613) |
CTD Sampling Mode | Burst Sampler |
Controller Board | APF 8 |
Additional Sensors/Software | None |
Park Depth | 2000 m |
Profile Depth | 2000 m |
Launch Date | 28-09-2002 |
Number of D-moded Profiles | 311 |
Calibration Date | 01-06-2012 |
Pressure Drift | Surface Pressure Offset corrected |
Salinity Drift | No salinity drift detected |
This float was located in the Indian Ocean, in an area bounded by 94 to 104 ºE and 17 to 23 º S.
The surface pressure for this float is shown in the plot below.
Potential Temperature-Salinity (a), Location (b, Max Temperature (c) and Sea Surface Salinity (d) plots located below.
The plot below shows the potential-temperature/salinity relationship for the deepest theta levels where the relationship between the two parameters should show the least variation.
The two plots below show a). the location of this float (black circles) in relation to the position of other nearby argo floats (coloured circles) and b). The potential-temperature/salinity curve for this float (in black) compared to nearby argo floats (coloured).
The potential-temperature/salinity relation for the deepest theta levels for this float (in black) and nearby argo floats (coloured) is displayed below.
There were inversions in profiles; 20, 122, 173, 257, 298, 305, 306, 309, 310, 311. None of these were significant and therefore were not flagged.
Salt hooks were located in profiles; 1,2,3,5,6,7,9,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,31,32,33,34,35,39,42,44,45,46,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,68,69,71, 72,73,75,76,77,78,79,81,82,83,84,85,86,87,88,89,90,91,93,94,95,97,98,99,102,103,104,105,106,107,108,109,112,113,114,115,116,117,118,119,121,122,123,125,126,128, 130,132,133,134,136,137,138,139,140,141,144,145,146. These were flagged as QC 4 for both T & S.
Profile 206 has two low salinity values which may be real but no neighbouring profiles are similar so QC these as 4.
The plot below shows the analysis of salinity drift using the OW software.
The four plots below show the salinity anomalies on theta surfaces compared to (a) the Gouretski and Kolterman climatology, (b) the CARS (CSIRO Atlas of Regional Seas)/WOA (World Ocean Atlas) climatology, (c) the anomalies within the float series itself, (i.e. the salinity anomaly of each profile from the mean profile average for the float and (d) the raw float salinity compared to the CARS and G&K climatological salinity on a deep theta surface.
Float is drifting along a frontal gradient. At first glance it appears that the float may be drifting salty but the float record cycles through low and high salinity values and therefore may simply be drifting in and out of the frontal region. At higher theta levels this float is close to the climatologies.
The plots below show the raw float salinity data (solid blue line) compared to neighbouring argo floats (coloured symbols) on a deep potential temperature surface. The locality map shows the location of the profiles for this float and for neighbouring floats.
The float appears to be at the salty end of the nearby float spectrum but it is close to three other floats that are not drifting (5901186,5901638,5900030) we therefore think this is likely to be real.
This float required no salinity drift correction.
The plot below summarises the QC flags and salinity differences for the raw and adjusted salinity fields in the final delayed mode files submitted to the GDAC.
Last Modified 01-06-2012