Sections below:
Float counts
| Meta Files
| Tech files
| Plots & listings
| Surface Pressure
| TNPD
Comments on this audit, based on GDAC at 22 Feb 2011
Allowed surface pressure parameter names
A table of agreed surface pressure offset parameter names has now
been circulated. Some names still in use are not on this table and
so are considered invalid. These are highlighted in red in the
"Parameter Names versus DAC" table below.
The group of about 400 SOLO floats using parameter names like
"PRES_DescentStart_dBAR" are excluded from this audit because that is
now an invalid name.
Progress of note
A significant number of extra TNPD profiles have been identified
and flagged at JMA. Also more agreement with the surface pressure correction
of about 150 AOML Apex floats.
Compliance summary for this audit
Comments on previous audit, based on GDAC at 15 Jan 2011
SOLO floats
We now test against the following pressure correction scheme for SOLO floats:
- Where parameter name is pres_surfaceoffsetbeforereset_dbar, assume
auto-correcting, but also allow that P(n) - SP(n+1) correction may have been
applied in DM, at the discretion of the DM operator. This may be true for
a whole float series or just some cycles. Only count discrepancies if
neither treatment matches DAC correction.
- Use the same approach where pres_surfaceoffsetnottruncated_dbar is
used (primarly Breck Owens floats.) This is contrary to the presently agreed
use of this parameter name and is expected to be a temporary measure until
the parameter name has been corrected for these floats. It is also not clear
that Surface Pressure is the quantity reported with this name.
An olive coloured patch on float plots indicates where the alternate
pressure correction agrees best with the DAC correction.
"PRES_DescentStart" parameter name
A group of SOLO floats had been recorded as missing surface pressure offset
parameters but actually used names like "PRES_DescentStart_dBAR". These 415
floats are now recognised, and treated as auto-correcting.
"Good" P, "bad" T and S
Some SOLO profiles were previously treated as in-use data but were in fact
ignored by the DAC because the T and S were flagged as bad. P had not been
flagged as bad because it is a derived rather than measured quantity. These
profiles are now detected and ignored.
Agreed treatment of particular floats
A list is now kept recording floats for which a DAC has explained the
reason for discrepancies in pressure corrections (typically that PI has
made decisions which cannot be made by automated software.) For such floats
any descrepancies between DAC and our corrections are excluded from
collation of statistics, and the float plot and listings are identified
with a pale green background colour.
Argo file format and Surface Pressure correction compliance Audit
Argo Technical and Meta file compliance Audit
This page is automatically created by code which scans all files
in the Argo USGODAE GDAC.
Previous versions can be accessed via the
CSIRO DMQC page
This analysis was based on GDAC as at 22-Feb-2011
Float counts in DACs
DAC details [explanations]
DAC name | AOML | BODC | CORIOLIS | CSIRO | GTS | JMA | MEDS | CSIO | INCOIS | KMA | KORDI |
# floats | 3607 | 328 | 1235 | 387 | 350 | 985 | 300 | 70 | 203 | 142 | 110 |
# Projects | 8 | 6 | 50 | 1 | 1 | 18 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 2 |
# PIs | 17 | 5 | 61 | 1 | 1 | 15 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 1 |
# Models | 14 | 3 | 46 | 3 | 1 | 19 | 5 | 3 | 5 | 3 | 4 |
Floats in multiple DACS
DAC | AOML | BODC | CORIOLIS | CSIRO | GTS | JMA | MEDS | CSIO | INCOIS | KMA | KORDI |
# floats | 3607 | 328 | 1235 | 387 | 350 | 985 | 300 | 70 | 203 | 142 | 110 |
dups in GTS | 8 | 1 | 3 | 1 | - | 2 | - | - | - | - | 53 |
other dups | - | - | 5 | - | - | - | - | - | 5 | 9 | 9 |
Meta files
Meta files [explanations]
DAC name | AOML | BODC | CORIOLIS | CSIRO | GTS | JMA | MEDS | CSIO | INCOIS | KMA | KORDI |
# floats | 3607 | 328 | 1235 | 387 | 350 | 985 | 300 | 70 | 203 | 142 | 110 |
# meta files | 3607 | 328 | 1235 | 387 | 350 | 985 | 300 | 70 | 203 | 133 | 110 |
broken A | - | - | - | - | 350 | - | - | - | - | - | - |
broken B | - | - | 15 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Bad launch info | 3 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
PLATFORM_MODEL The strings found in the PLATFORM_MODEL fields Strings have been converted to lower case and blanks removed to assist match-ups
field contents | AOML | BODC | CORIOLIS | CSIRO | GTS | JMA | MEDS | CSIO | INCOIS | KMA | KORDI | TOTAL |
Empty Field | - | - | - | - | 350 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 350 |
apex | - | - | - | - | - | - | 183 | - | - | 90 | - | 273 |
provor | - | - | 18 | 3 | - | - | 31 | - | 15 | - | 26 | 93 |
palace_n/a | 17 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 17 |
solo_sbe | 1425 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1425 |
apex_sbe | 1572 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 58 | 4 | - | - | 1634 |
soloof_fsi | 28 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 28 |
solo_fsi | 272 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 272 |
apexir_sbe | 190 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 2 | - | - | - | 192 |
soloir_sbe | 80 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 80 |
apex_seascan | 10 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 10 |
apex_n/a | 2 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 2 |
solo_sbe41cp | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1 |
solo2ir_sbe | 2 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 2 |
provor_seascan | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1 |
provor_n/a | 6 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 6 |
provor_sbe | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 10 | 1 | - | - | 12 |
apex-sbe | - | 302 | - | 374 | - | 808 | 81 | - | 181 | 43 | 39 | 1828 |
martec-fsi | - | 21 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 21 |
martec-sbe | - | 5 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 5 |
provor ctf2 | - | - | 62 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 62 |
apex sbe apf7 | - | - | 93 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 93 |
provor ctf3 | - | - | 38 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 38 |
provor cts2 | - | - | 168 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 168 |
apex sbe apf8 | - | - | 215 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 215 |
nemo | - | - | 113 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 113 |
nemo 2.5 | - | - | 4 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 4 |
provor cts3 | - | - | 171 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 171 |
apex sbe 41 apf8 | - | - | 7 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 7 |
arvor iridium | - | - | 4 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 4 |
provor cts3 do | - | - | 18 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 18 |
arvor | - | - | 4 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 4 |
provor cts3 4.82 | - | - | 20 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 20 |
apex sbe41 apf8 | - | - | 48 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 48 |
apex apf9a f/w w | - | - | 6 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 6 |
apex apf9a f/w | - | - | 55 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 55 |
metocean 1 | - | - | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1 |
provor cts3 do 9 | - | - | 15 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 15 |
apex apf8 rev da | - | - | 4 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 4 |
apex-apf8c | - | - | 12 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 12 |
apex apf8 rey da | - | - | 2 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 2 |
provor t | - | - | 35 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 35 |
provor 1 | - | - | 2 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 2 |
apex sbe apf8b s | - | - | 3 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 3 |
apex sbe apf8b | - | - | 14 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 14 |
apex sbe apf8 s | - | - | 10 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 10 |
apex sbe apf8 sn | - | - | 11 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 11 |
apex sbe apf8 2 | - | - | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1 |
apex sbe apf8 | - | - | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1 |
apex sbe-43f apf | - | - | 3 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 3 |
apex apf9a f/w s | - | - | 3 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 3 |
apex-apf9 | - | - | 19 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 19 |
apex-apf9a | - | - | 25 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 25 |
apex 19 | - | - | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1 |
provor bioargo | - | - | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1 |
2625 | - | - | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1 |
apex-apf9i | - | - | 4 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 4 |
apex sbe-41-alac | - | - | 3 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 3 |
apex sbe-1-alace | - | - | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1 |
apex sbe -41-ala | - | - | 2 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 2 |
apex sbe-41 ap | - | - | 2 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 2 |
apex sbe-41 apf | - | - | 8 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 8 |
apex sbe-41 a | - | - | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1 |
provor ct | - | - | 5 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 5 |
apex sbe -41 apf | - | - | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1 |
r1-sbe | - | - | - | 10 | - | 2 | - | - | - | - | - | 12 |
palace | - | - | - | - | - | 4 | - | - | - | - | - | 4 |
alace_r1-fsi | - | - | - | - | - | 2 | - | - | - | - | - | 2 |
r1-sbe profiler | - | - | - | - | - | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | 1 |
r1-td | - | - | - | - | - | 9 | - | - | - | - | - | 9 |
provor-sbe | - | - | - | - | - | 83 | - | - | - | - | - | 83 |
ninja-tsk | - | - | - | - | - | 3 | - | - | - | - | - | 3 |
ninja-sbe | - | - | - | - | - | 12 | - | - | - | - | - | 12 |
tem. profiler | - | - | - | - | - | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | 1 |
apex-sbe-aandera | - | - | - | - | - | 7 | - | - | - | - | - | 7 |
provor-sbe cts-3 | - | - | - | - | - | 13 | - | - | - | - | - | 13 |
ninja-sbe-flntu | - | - | - | - | - | 2 | - | - | - | - | - | 2 |
nemo-sbe | - | - | - | - | - | 9 | - | - | - | - | - | 9 |
arvor-sbe | - | - | - | - | - | 19 | - | - | - | - | - | 19 |
apex-fsi | - | - | - | - | - | 3 | - | - | - | - | - | 3 |
pops-sbe | - | - | - | - | - | 2 | - | - | - | - | - | 2 |
apex-td profiler | - | - | - | - | - | 4 | - | - | - | - | - | 4 |
pops-provor-sbe | - | - | - | - | - | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | 1 |
p-alace | - | - | - | - | - | - | 4 | - | - | - | - | 4 |
apex-sbe/optode | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1 | - | - | - | - | 1 |
provor_fsi | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 2 | - | - | 2 |
260apex | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 10 | 10 |
apex-sbe_do | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 35 | 35 |
Basic MODEL Grouping PLATFORM_MODEL fields by stanard float types
Basic type | AOML | BODC | CORIOLIS | CSIRO | GTS | JMA | MEDS | CSIO | INCOIS | KMA | KORDI | TOTAL |
Unknown | - | - | 2 | - | 350 | 6 | 4 | - | - | 9 | 10 | 381 |
apex | 1774 | 302 | 555 | 374 | - | 822 | 265 | 60 | 185 | 133 | 74 | 4544 |
solo | 1808 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1808 |
provor | 8 | - | 553 | 3 | - | 96 | 31 | 10 | 18 | - | 26 | 745 |
nemo | - | - | 117 | - | - | 9 | - | - | - | - | - | 126 |
ninja | - | - | - | - | - | 17 | - | - | - | - | - | 17 |
martec | - | 26 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 26 |
palace | 17 | - | - | - | - | 4 | - | - | - | - | - | 21 |
arvor | - | - | 8 | - | - | 19 | - | - | - | - | - | 27 |
r1 | - | - | - | 10 | - | 12 | - | - | - | - | - | 22 |
PLATFORM_MODEL field - APF9 Status [explanations]
| AOML | BODC | CORIOLIS | CSIRO | GTS | JMA | MEDS | CSIO | INCOIS | KMA | KORDI | TOTAL |
Not APEX | 1833 | 26 | 680 | 13 | 350 | 163 | 35 | 10 | 18 | 9 | 26 | 3163 |
APEX not APF9 | - | - | 421 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 421 |
APEX unknown | 1774 | 302 | 22 | 374 | - | 822 | 265 | 60 | 185 | 133 | 84 | 4021 |
APEX APF9 | - | - | 112 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 112 |
Manual list* | 301 | - | - | 12 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 313 |
SENSOR pressure field * Sensor names converted to lower case and blanks removed to assist match-ups
* | AOML | BODC | CORIOLIS | CSIRO | GTS | JMA | MEDS | CSIO | INCOIS | KMA | KORDI | TOTAL |
Empty Field | - | 4 | 896 | - | - | 5 | 300 | - | - | - | 110 | 1315 |
druck | 67 | - | - | 315 | - | - | - | - | 179 | - | - | 561 |
mp40-c-2000-g | 14 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 14 |
n/a | 1489 | - | 88 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1577 |
sbe41 | 341 | - | - | - | - | 421 | - | 24 | 5 | - | - | 791 |
sbe | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1 |
2900psia | 1251 | - | 79 | - | - | - | - | 46 | - | - | - | 1376 |
sbe41cp | 432 | - | 16 | - | - | 34 | - | - | - | - | - | 482 |
sstd | 10 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 10 |
2000dbar | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1 |
1500psia | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1 |
sbe-41 | - | 299 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 299 |
ectp202mar | - | 21 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 21 |
sbe-41cp | - | 4 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 4 |
sbe41cp-2900psia | - | - | 19 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 19 |
sbe41cp?2900psia | - | - | 64 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 64 |
paine3000psia | - | - | 5 | 2 | - | - | - | - | 17 | - | - | 24 |
none | - | - | 6 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 6 |
3000psia | - | - | 8 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 8 |
41 | - | - | 13 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 13 |
41do | - | - | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1 |
xxxx | - | - | 16 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 16 |
sbe41do | - | - | 2 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 2 |
sbe41cp2900psia | - | - | 4 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 4 |
1600psia | - | - | 3 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 3 |
paine | - | - | - | 38 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 38 |
amatek | - | - | - | 19 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 19 |
kistler | - | - | - | 13 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 13 |
straingauge_sbe41 | - | - | - | - | - | 400 | - | - | - | - | - | 400 |
straingauge | - | - | - | - | - | 26 | - | - | - | - | - | 26 |
straingauge_sbe41cp | - | - | - | - | - | 92 | - | - | - | - | - | 92 |
straingauge_ctd-f01 | - | - | - | - | - | 3 | - | - | - | - | - | 3 |
sbe41,2900psias/n4867 | - | - | - | - | - | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | 1 |
sbe41,3000psias/n2657701518 | - | - | - | - | - | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | 1 |
sbe37 | - | - | - | - | - | 2 | - | - | - | - | - | 2 |
fsi41 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 2 | - | - | 2 |
sbecp41 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 133 | - | 133 |
SENSOR pressure Maker field * names converted to lower case and blanks removed to assist match-ups
* | AOML | BODC | CORIOLIS | CSIRO | GTS | JMA | MEDS | CSIO | INCOIS | KMA | KORDI | TOTAL |
Empty Field | - | 4 | 897 | - | - | 9 | - | - | - | - | 110 | 1020 |
micron | 14 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 14 |
paines | 91 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 91 |
sbe | 918 | - | 17 | - | - | - | 300 | 24 | 5 | 133 | - | 1397 |
n/a | 96 | - | 81 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 177 |
druck | 2392 | - | 174 | - | - | - | - | 46 | - | - | - | 2612 |
2900psia | 67 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 67 |
kistler | 5 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 5 |
seascan | 11 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 11 |
ametec | 12 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 12 |
paine | 1 | - | 4 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 5 |
seabird | - | 303 | 5 | 387 | - | - | - | - | 196 | - | - | 891 |
fsi | - | 21 | - | - | - | 1 | - | - | 2 | - | - | 24 |
martec | - | - | 7 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 7 |
sea-birdelectronics | - | - | 3 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 3 |
manufacturerdruck | - | - | 6 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 6 |
ametek | - | - | 7 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 7 |
xxxx | - | - | 18 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 18 |
none | - | - | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1 |
sea-birdelectronics,inc._druck | - | - | - | - | - | 551 | - | - | - | - | - | 551 |
sea-birdelectronics,inc. | - | - | - | - | - | 164 | - | - | - | - | - | 164 |
sea-birdelectronics,inc.(druck) | - | - | - | - | - | 85 | - | - | - | - | - | 85 |
sea-birdelectronics,inc._kistler | - | - | - | - | - | 93 | - | - | - | - | - | 93 |
falmouthscientific,inc. | - | - | - | - | - | 4 | - | - | - | - | - | 4 |
sea-birdelectronics,inc._paine | - | - | - | - | - | 13 | - | - | - | - | - | 13 |
sea-birdelectronics,inc._ametek | - | - | - | - | - | 59 | - | - | - | - | - | 59 |
thetsurumi-seikico.,ltd. | - | - | - | - | - | 3 | - | - | - | - | - | 3 |
notspecified | - | - | - | - | - | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | 1 |
sea-birdelectronics,inc | - | - | - | - | - | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | 1 |
sea-birdelectronics,inc._ | - | - | - | - | - | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | 1 |
SENSOR pressure Serial Number field
S/N | AOML | BODC | CORIOLIS | CSIRO | GTS | JMA | MEDS | CSIO | INCOIS | KMA | KORDI | TOTAL |
# floats | 3607 | 328 | 1235 | 387 | 350 | 985 | 300 | 70 | 203 | 142 | 110 |
No decodable number | 430 | 9 | 1143 | - | 350 | 20 | 141 | 1 | 15 | 19 | 110 | 2238 |
tech files
Tech files [explanations]
Format | AOML | BODC | CORIOLIS | CSIRO | GTS | JMA | MEDS | CSIO | INCOIS | KMA | KORDI | TOTAL |
No profiles | 135 | 18 | 101 | 6 | 350 | 8 | 5 | 5 | 7 | 26 | 110 | 771 |
Missing | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
Old | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 7 | - | - | - | 8 |
Old - Bad | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
|
New | 3471 | 310 | 1134 | 381 | - | 977 | 295 | 58 | 196 | 116 | - | 6938 |
New, no Surf Pres | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
New, Bad format | 12 | - | 83 | - | - | 15 | 4 | - | - | - | - | 114 |
|
V 2.3 | 3471 | 310 | 1134 | 381 | - | 977 | 295 | 58 | 196 | 116 | - | 6938 |
Surface Pressure Offset parameter name
| AOML | BODC | CORIOLIS | CSIRO | GTS | JMA | MEDS | CSIO | INCOIS | KMA | KORDI | TOTAL |
Old format |
Other | 2 | - | 2 | 1 | - | 6 | 1 | 4 | 1 | - | 106 | 123 |
surface_pressure | - | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1 |
surface_offset | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
pressure_sensor_offset | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
start_surface_pressure | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1 |
pressure_offset_(counts) | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1 |
pressure_offset_(dbar) | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 7 | - | - | - | 7 |
New format |
Missing | 30 | - | 98 | 4 | - | 16 | 4 | - | - | - | - | 152 |
pres_surfaceoffsettruncatedplus5dbar_dbar | 1052 | 244 | 405 | 218 | - | 671 | 217 | 42 | 139 | 104 | - | 3092 |
pres_surfaceoffsettruncated_dbar | - | - | - | - | - | 2 | - | - | - | - | - | 2 |
pres_surfaceoffsetnottruncatedplus5dbar_dbar | - | - | - | - | - | 3 | - | - | - | - | - | 3 |
pres_surfaceoffsetnottruncated_dbar | 1432 | 61 | 404 | 163 | - | 165 | 46 | 16 | 57 | 12 | - | 2356 |
pres_surfaceoffsetbeforereset_dbar | 497 | - | - | - | - | 3 | - | - | - | - | - | 500 |
pres_surfaceoffsetbeforereset_1dbarresolution_dbar | - | 5 | 171 | - | - | 51 | - | - | - | - | - | 227 |
pres_surfaceoffsetbeforereset_1cbarresolution_dbar | - | - | 67 | - | - | 61 | - | - | - | - | - | 128 |
pres_surfaceoffsetafterreset_dbar | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
pres_offsetadjustment_dbar | 69 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 69 |
pressure_offset_dbar | - | - | - | - | - | - | 28 | - | - | - | - | 28 |
pres_surfacecomplement_dbar | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
pres_descentstart_dbar | 413 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 413 |
pres_descentstartafterreset_dbar | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
pres_surface_dbar | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
pres_surfaceoffsettruncatedplus3dbar_dbar | - | - | - | - | - | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | 1 |
pres_surfaceoffsetnottrancated_dbar | - | - | - | - | - | 6 | - | - | - | - | - | 6 |
|
Multiple SP names per profile | 992 | - | 20 | 2 | - | 25 | - | - | - | - | - | 1039 |
SP name changes thru float lifetime | 131 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 131 |
|
% ok SP values [explanation] | 96 | 97 | 96 | 99 | - | 96 | 97 | 99 | 100 | 100 | - | - |
Surface Pressure Offset parameter name vs model
| apex | solo | provor | nemo | ninja | martec | palace | arvor | r1 | Unknown | All models |
Other | 82 | 1 | 33 | - | - | - | - | - | - | 7 | 116 |
surface_pressure | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1 |
surface_offset | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
pressure_sensor_offset | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
start_surface_pressure | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1 | - | - | - | 1 |
pressure_offset_(counts) | - | 1 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1 |
pressure_offset_(dbar) | - | - | 7 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 7 |
Missing | 24 | 10 | 14 | 86 | 14 | - | - | - | - | 4 | 148 |
pres_surfaceoffsettruncatedplus5dbar_dbar | 3080 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 12 | - | 3092 |
pres_surfaceoffsettruncated_dbar | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 2 | - |
pres_surfaceoffsetnottruncatedplus5dbar_dbar | 3 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 3 |
pres_surfaceoffsetnottruncated_dbar | 1229 | 768 | 312 | 9 | - | 19 | 4 | 1 | 9 | 5 | 2351 |
pres_surfaceoffsetbeforereset_dbar | - | 497 | - | - | 3 | - | - | - | - | - | 500 |
pres_surfaceoffsetbeforereset_1dbarresolution_dbar | - | - | 218 | - | - | 5 | - | 3 | - | 1 | 226 |
pres_surfaceoffsetbeforereset_1cbarresolution_dbar | - | - | 105 | - | - | - | - | 23 | - | - | 128 |
pres_surfaceoffsetafterreset_dbar | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
pres_offsetadjustment_dbar | - | 69 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 69 |
pressure_offset_dbar | - | - | 28 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 28 |
pres_surfacecomplement_dbar | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
pres_descentstart_dbar | 12 | 385 | - | - | - | - | 16 | - | - | - | 413 |
pres_descentstartafterreset_dbar | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
pres_surface_dbar | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
pres_surfaceoffsettruncatedplus3dbar_dbar | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 1 | - | 1 |
pres_surfaceoffsetnottrancated_dbar | 6 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | 6 |
Plots and listings analysing the Surface Pressure Offset
correction for
all floats for each DAC are accessed through the
Plots Index Tables. Separate tables link to all floats, or only floats
with apparent SP correction anomalies, or only floats with apparent TNPD.
Note: The following analyses were based on assumptions about
behaviour of different types of floats, where "type" was here primarily
defined by the Surface Pressure Offset parameter name. Some of these
assumptions will be wrong, and some types are not analysed at all because I
am unsure of their behaviour. It is probably necessary to also take basic float
model (eg Apex or SOLO) into account to fully determine the pressure correction
treatment required for a float, but it would be better if this could be fully
determined by just the parameter name. My assumptions are recorded in this
table.
Surface Pressure Offset
We have attempted to test for correct Surface Pressure (SP) correction of
profile pressure.
The difference between PRES and PRES_ADJUSTED is the DAC-applied
pressure correction (assuming PRES is the raw P as reported by the float.)
Correct application of this test depends on being able to deduce the
correct float type and P adjustment from the meta and tech files. However
this is not always possible due to missing or non-standard entries in these
files.
Our computed pressure correction is
p_calc = PRES - (SP - adjustment)
where adjustment is the known SP adjustment for a given float type (usually
5dbar).
For Apex floats the SP reported with a profile actually relates to the
previous profile, because it was recorded just as the float begins to
descend. RT profile pressure can only be adjusted with the SP reported with
the same profile, but in DM profiles the correct SP is used (ie for profile N,
p_calc(N) = PRES(N) - (SP(N+1) - adjustment)
So, in the provided plots , for floats which do not auto-correct, the
"Calculated Correction" (CC) is
For DM profiles: CC = SP(N+1) - adjustment
For RT profiles: CC = SP(N) - adjustment
For this reason, CC will differ from Raw Surface Pressure by the "offset", and
will be displaced by one profile for DM profiles. The "DAC adjustment" should
however agree with the CC.
Interpretting the plots: For complete agreement in pressure correction,
the "DAC Adjustment" (blue squares), should agree with the CC (red stars).
Missing "DAC Adjustment" symbols can occur where there is no PRES_ADJUSTED profile
(eg if QC=4). Missing CC symbols can occur where the DAC has provided an SP
estimate (possibly by interpolation) but the automated process has not [due to
different processing or because the tech files are not quite up-to-date.]
Disagreement is likewise visible where "MPP minus CC" (cyan diamond) does
not overlay "Min Corrected Pressure" (magenta square). The latter quantity is just
the near-surface PRES_ADJUSTED value.
A light gray background is used where disagreement is between 0.1 and 1.0 dbar.
This occurs frequently due to DAC smoothing of the SP series, or for other reasons.
A dark gray background indicates disagreement greater than 1.0 dbar. Some
of these cases are due to deficiencies in our automatic procedures, but some
others appear to be related to processing faults at the DACs.
An olive green background behind the CC value indicates an alternative
correction method (such as allowed for SOLO floats) gives better agreement
with the DAC value than the primary method. The CC value shown is then as
derived by the alternative method. For example, SOLO floats are auto-correcting,
so the primary method is "no correction". However, a secondary method - the
normal SP(n+1) correction - may be applied in DM if there is evidence of strong
drift.
A very pale green background indicates that the DAC has explained how their
adjustment is correct, or pointed out that the CSIRO audit software has made a
mistake. Any disagreement in these profile is ignored when collating statistics.
See the table which summarizes the results
of this pressure correction audit for all DACs.
Lists: for each DAC a text file (accessable through the
Plots Index Tables) lists the result of checking the surface pressure correction for every
float. The floats are grouped by PI. The lists give the number of DM profiles,
total number of profiles, assumed surface pressure offset, and counts of profiles
which agree exactly or disagree with my automated correction. Please note
that in many cases the disagreement is because your DAC correction is a better
choice than my automated one.
Format example:
5900033 DM 264/295 SPoffs=5 Diffs(dbar) =0[271] <1 [0] >1 [ 1 *]
Of 295 profiles for this float, 264 have been DM processed. 271 profiles exactly
agree with my automated correction, 0 disagree by a small amount, but 1
disagrees by more than 1 dbar.
TNPD
Truncated Negative Drifting Pressure (TNPD) is a term used to describe
Apex floats which truncate negative surface pressure values (all firmware
prior to APF9) and the pressure sensor develops a strong negative drift. The
usual cause of strong negative drift in these sensors is the "microleak"
fault associated with Druck sensors. The pressure in profiles affected by
TNPD cannot be corrected for surface pressure offset.
The first step in detecting TNPD is to determine if a float is of the type
where such an fault might occur. We have attempted to do this using the tech
and meta files alone, but this is not always possible.
The next step is to find where the reported SP (corrected for 5dbar adjustment
if necessary) has "flat spots" on zero, indicating that negative values are being
truncated. Previously a float with 80% SP=0 was declared to be TNPD.
We now say that any susceptible float is in a TNPD state after the last
believable positive SP value. This is because the strong negative drift condition
is typically monotonic, so if such a condition has commenced then typical
variability will not give rise to small positive SP values.
The main difficulty of this approach [assuming the basic assumptions
are correct] is determining when isolated positive values are natural
perturbations about a small negative value, or when they are just sensor
error spikes. In the present analysis I have used (for the first time) the
crude test that a positive value > 1dbar which has 2 zero values
immediately either side of it, is a spike that can be ignored. [This differs to
the standard despiking process used to prepare the SP series for pressure
correction because here we just want a simple way of assessing where an SP series
is devoid of true +ve values.] Obviously this is very imperfect - there is no
substitute for skilled DM analysis, and in very
many cases the DAC will be right and our algorithm will be wrong.
Another deficiency of our algorithm is that is [apparently] extremely
unlikely that microleaking will start after years of correct operation. For
example, if SP is 0 for the last 5 of 200 profiles then the algorithm says
TNPD commenced at profile 196. The time of onset of TNPD is examined in this
set of TNPD plots. That page also includes plots
which examining whether, for different sensor
types, a large negative drift can be followed by recovery to plausible positive
SP values.
"Start of TNPD" in the surface pressure plots provided indicates where TNPD
appears to commences, according to the above algorithm, if that is at least 6
months before the last DM profile. If the condition is met with less than
6 months of subsequent DM profiles, then 'Potential TNPD' is displayed.
Where some of the float series has been DM processed,
extra information is provided for the DM profiles in an extra frame at the top
of the figure.
Extra information in upper frame on plots
Name | Colour/Where | Meaning |
P Adj QC | top half | profile minimum PRES_ADJUSTED_QC for each DM profile, value indicated by scale on left of frame |
DM | Lower middle | DM processed profiles |
No P ADJ | Lower middle | PRES_ADJUSTED profiles not populated |
TNPD Comment | Near bottom | Has correct pressure SCIENTIFIC_CALIB_COMMENT for a TNPD profile |
P ERR 2.4 | bottom | profile min PRES_ADJUSTED_ERROR==2.4 |
P ERR 20 | bottom | profile min PRES_ADJUSTED_ERROR==20 |
See the table which summarizes the results
of this TNPD treatment audit for all DACs.
Lists: for each DAC two text files (accessable through the
Plots Index Tables) list the result
of checking for TNPD. The floats are grouped by PI.
The "short" list gives the cycle number ("pn") where TNPD appears to start,
and counts of profiles which appear to require the TNPD comment string and do not
have it ("missed"),
or do have the comment string ("good"), or have a comment string which is not
precisely the standard string ("imperfect"). The list also notes where we have
NOT detected TNPD but have found the TNPD comment string.
|